From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Wink Saville <wink@saville.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, sunshine@sunshineco.com, Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/9] Call git_rebase__interactive from run_specific_rebase
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:27:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqpo3wklt2.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47b224af1c22900a69d0e292935f37a719b6a9f3.1521690197.git.wink@saville.com> (Wink Saville's message of "Thu, 22 Mar 2018 09:57:22 -0700")
Wink Saville <wink@saville.com> writes:
> Instead of indirectly invoking git_rebase__interactive this invokes
> it directly after sourcing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wink Saville <wink@saville.com>
> ---
> git-rebase--interactive.sh | 11 -----------
> git-rebase.sh | 11 +++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/git-rebase--interactive.sh b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> index 561e2660e..213d75f43 100644
> --- a/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> +++ b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> @@ -740,15 +740,6 @@ get_missing_commit_check_level () {
> printf '%s' "$check_level" | tr 'A-Z' 'a-z'
> }
>
> -# The whole contents of this file is run by dot-sourcing it from
> -# inside a shell function. It used to be that "return"s we see
> -# below were not inside any function, and expected to return
> -# to the function that dot-sourced us.
> -#
> -# However, older (9.x) versions of FreeBSD /bin/sh misbehave on such a
> -# construct and continue to run the statements that follow such a "return".
> -# As a work-around, we introduce an extra layer of a function
> -# here, and immediately call it after defining it.
We still enclose the whole thing (including the returns that are
problematic for older FreeBSD shells) in a shell function, so it's
not like we are dropping the workaround for these systems. It's
just the caller of the function moved.
I think the removal of this large comment is justifiable, but the
structure still needs a bit of explanation, especially given that
the caller in git-rebase.sh needs to treat this scriptlet a bit
differently from others.
If we were not in the (longer term) process of getting rid of
git-rebase.sh, it might even make sense to port the same
"dot-sourced scriptlet defines a shell function to be called, and
the caller calls it after dot-sourcing it" pattern to other rebase
backends, so that the calling side can be unified again to become
something like:
. git-rebase--$type
git_rebase__$type
ret=$?
> git_rebase__interactive () {
>
> case "$action" in
> @@ -1029,5 +1020,3 @@ fi
> do_rest
>
> }
> -# ... and then we call the whole thing.
> -git_rebase__interactive
> diff --git a/git-rebase.sh b/git-rebase.sh
> index a1f6e5de6..c4ec7c21b 100755
> --- a/git-rebase.sh
> +++ b/git-rebase.sh
> @@ -196,8 +196,15 @@ run_specific_rebase () {
> export GIT_EDITOR
> autosquash=
> fi
> - . git-rebase--$type
> - ret=$?
> + if test "$type" = interactive
> + then
> + . git-rebase--interactive
> + git_rebase__interactive
> + ret=$?
> + else
> + . git-rebase--$type
> + ret=$?
> + fi
> if test $ret -eq 0
> then
> finish_rebase
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-22 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-22 16:57 [RFC PATCH v3 0/9] rebase-interactive: Wink Saville
2018-03-22 16:57 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/9] Simplify pick_on_preserving_merges Wink Saville
2018-03-22 16:57 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/9] Call git_rebase__interactive from run_specific_rebase Wink Saville
2018-03-22 18:27 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2018-03-22 19:28 ` Wink Saville
2018-03-22 20:03 ` [RFC PATCH v3.1 2/9 2/2] rebase-interactive: Do not automatically run code Wink Saville
2018-03-22 20:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-22 22:45 ` Wink Saville
2018-03-23 2:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-22 16:57 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/9] Indent function git_rebase__interactive Wink Saville
2018-03-23 17:43 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-03-22 16:57 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/9] Extract functions out of git_rebase__interactive Wink Saville
2018-03-22 16:57 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/9] Use new functions in git_rebase__interactive Wink Saville
2018-03-23 17:42 ` Johannes Schindelin
2018-03-23 18:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-23 20:09 ` Wink Saville
2018-03-22 16:57 ` [RFC PATCH v3 6/9] Add and use git_rebase__interactive__preserve_merges Wink Saville
2018-03-22 16:57 ` [RFC PATCH v3 7/9] Remove unused code paths from git_rebase__interactive Wink Saville
2018-03-22 16:57 ` [RFC PATCH v3 8/9] Remove unused code paths from git_rebase__interactive__preserve_merges Wink Saville
2018-03-22 16:57 ` [RFC PATCH v3 9/9] Remove merges_option and a blank line Wink Saville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqpo3wklt2.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=wink@saville.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).