From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7EF1F454 for ; Thu, 1 Nov 2018 05:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727639AbeKAOWv (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2018 10:22:51 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f66.google.com ([209.85.221.66]:40692 "EHLO mail-wr1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726396AbeKAOWv (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2018 10:22:51 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f66.google.com with SMTP id i17-v6so18769270wre.7 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2018 22:21:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=4Vi3tEW0RNX6dgZiamfvP7RTgaXUP2QqNqBSvDYl98s=; b=QmN8pnDguQG0ClJFwC5rc8WQw7f9g35rgDbS55FWnrRrpax9uN7TfOZlKoOfrmOs36 ZqhvmfKeZrL89AsjvKLPlv9r5SG0dcCuuRoOJS99zOcfGyde3j58N2nsw2RIdRQKrd32 7UsSeI8cU8ZGNHyQUK+8BLpC9Eg7xD0qlmZ9IoRSo3bxSZCNLT2kuDUjyIc2GX5uzKJ5 /GWqkKkxTTHXOLY5R5N0VmP7L0P4wbVk2SjMvgtP39L9v9h+f1a+fqXBb24NhBKAw/34 8X5a3w+j1aT/1TcYpxr7Uu2ZTPRCTTStI935DEOW9m6OA7JooSiyuV22CeTYeGYQ9/Vq hkKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=4Vi3tEW0RNX6dgZiamfvP7RTgaXUP2QqNqBSvDYl98s=; b=iMnP3ssEwVIuyewi2+SD9JhBIavsiwV83akZGpfz/Y+QKK2DvpmuPXxvro25LFfpNU KL1VgeASY5zUt2LTycl0qSF7W996OZjn5DPfKJIjLYI/4lO4oSd4moMKToDHjSa+Wm4C is75rXsW7XIaPyOrEKNVxf2h3+yJ/6gqJsVkNw00ITGR4tYyp/UgPDLzDkV260pU8Smf IT0Rsmg1sY3U2h6MQoutaE4cxvf03rmY2Rz4h+mXQYNtSz07C1Kp9IW007MxX7PpCoLF 2pOr5BwbUx4TO1LgaYx/e7LYvgxvv7h78jQ6Tw9CNSdEWJ5+DNQOR8SbXQFzq756fkcr 6fxg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gLHhVgyVK31FJdOojSnXk96MUfeZUJjgJAgKb+kcNp/V/Wt0aU6 z6F+w35v7Ck2nWsaxm94shY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fT7agK+JRLXSXgLFLR9mHmaoVfIsNUyUTldbbww24WMEUAFcJDBH3v15l0LcmGS2fWrqjrPg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:65cf:: with SMTP id e15-v6mr5082730wrw.149.1541049684935; Wed, 31 Oct 2018 22:21:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (168.50.187.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.187.50.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l5-v6sm5977474wrv.84.2018.10.31.22.21.22 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 31 Oct 2018 22:21:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] Use generation numbers for --topo-order References: Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2018 14:21:21 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget's message of "Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:36:35 -0700 (PDT)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget" writes: > This patch series performs a decently-sized refactoring of the revision-walk > machinery. Well, "refactoring" is probably the wrong word, as I don't > actually remove the old code. Instead, when we see certain options in the > 'rev_info' struct, we redirect the commit-walk logic to a new set of methods > that distribute the workload differently. By using generation numbers in the > commit-graph, we can significantly improve 'git log --graph' commands (and > the underlying 'git rev-list --topo-order'). Review discussions seem to have petered out. Would we merge this to 'next' and start cooking, perhaps for the remainder of this cycle?