From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49FF1F5AD for ; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 22:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389493AbgDMWOY (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:14:24 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:64738 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727871AbgDMWOW (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:14:22 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20F152C98; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:14:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=FAtqeYrY8VG6vGR9GmnalWMALzc=; b=tlOZPk B4zofY1doYqHhtHLoijLYfX2hs/k9UpXNAdpbtDRZ3lROB5DQWjunzs1GiH3HkMw jjXCQ130UwV2VBGjtpraDW5NgnAZ2WwbkNTrINN7uWB1AKFsukljEu/rRldHR009 e5WAs2udrtFp0kjuHfpM+FQtdGeTB5Hm3VMQQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=v0dZIKeEEVJW6cPTHBPjR0+M2OWgfSuG TSoK6AflRsT4ZtLLpKE5IQjk/7PbueowghQNrMitxxIix0M8/fxHBDQ7OGpKVqfI xuajGNeuBP+GDSebp4qnN47j7rHRDUkCvTC2ei53btyLj5n2wR4uDTd667E+tW4V uDzizx+Khjg= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAAE152C97; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:14:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 660D552C94; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:14:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Taylor Blau Cc: Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] config: reject parsing of files over INT_MAX References: <20200410194211.GA1363484@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20200410195007.GF1363756@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20200410221549.GA2078378@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20200413004724.GB55122@syl.local> Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:14:19 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200413004724.GB55122@syl.local> (Taylor Blau's message of "Sun, 12 Apr 2020 18:47:24 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1F90E89C-7DD4-11EA-BF33-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Taylor Blau writes: > ;). Making it lower than INT_MAX moves us into the territory of deciding > what is an "appropriately" sized config file, which I'd rather not do. > At least we can blame INT_MAX if someone has a too-large config file. ;-) Sensible.