From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB411F910 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2022 07:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="P/QlZh5O"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229664AbiKYHVK (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2022 02:21:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47092 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229534AbiKYHVI (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Nov 2022 02:21:08 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x631.google.com (mail-pl1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::631]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6B4DDF85 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 23:21:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x631.google.com with SMTP id y4so3261426plb.2 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 23:21:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=POzvCcgZJQauODcIh0cFLFgNWu9tJBfvYTv7IJSIa8Y=; b=P/QlZh5OFNeQh+jfCee0GrkpzpZqmOrmdqkkJoLVWgZiOCFKeFeANMHRyogkEHAJJ0 xuzxIzpy2glAUPrixnyDZl0T3FdZd1yFIDrdpe4FzpLdxjZnZiaUyf272CeD2azhrPRC j7whFgtWWeYAFB/7j34wBFbP8Ezqr7WuN/eGN3FMUx7kQEbzTI6TQGRmWdR3SSC4ixGC BCi7a5jJ2USFSpAU24Zoif/kxT0koqR7nsu58zdqpA3SJpDVc2ehK5Vhplct7LFRMwEJ HUtGUc+hcdKWgDLJsYtFoCJqJWU7jLXNzkUMps8zy+Ji47B7GDBCUnmFS1xuQvu7h5gI 3hTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:subject:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=POzvCcgZJQauODcIh0cFLFgNWu9tJBfvYTv7IJSIa8Y=; b=zA3UxUNtF4OIR1vN+UkCqpTc5pePfXqbqRX5LtrHOozNtJ6JeZz4urwyIXasklty07 Q/mPGCEsM3Fkv2SS1kbx8qSOo6lylKJWvsEb2nu26bievOsFufTQKsFsO6o+11dgDrVa SOOeBVpI1gvTnQx5bzrIPy0sXe2ChHIISPtc6ThSkVdzPmjKgWVlEnV21W0CAX1NGTVF JeMXGextsBooWVJ3gCP5qB5YMe676hHGLXnMjDpYu4iMaaxY2Mw0mi3HMJs2/9YrxpSW UATyf9pg2gqER8pQDJsMPEi+4JaRf14GC784ZB8xPpP8FvO8dADY1OYn9SuWJX6uatwE RBxw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pl+zD7YdwJgaT2KyqWaWfnunPvXnwTMPP/zwyfrCUCqt+fL/K0o NAEP9jU/5csFD2UBHuH3vFY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf43YIosFhEgwajNofa41xUFRbmI8zxL4/nJ+LZsHtDJzp0/pW/gizj9d0UTHuzweWgjoD25/Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:1bc2:b0:218:8bdb:de3f with SMTP id r2-20020a17090a1bc200b002188bdbde3fmr32073213pjr.225.1669360865328; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 23:21:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (33.5.83.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.83.5.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u6-20020a170903124600b00186fd3951f7sm2580396plh.211.2022.11.24.23.21.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 24 Nov 2022 23:21:04 -0800 (PST) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: Jiang Xin , Git List , Jiang Xin , Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] github-actions: run gcc-8 on ubuntu-20.04 image References: <20221123150233.13039-1-worldhello.net@gmail.com> <20221124090545.4790-2-worldhello.net@gmail.com> <221124.86mt8gpqra.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 16:21:04 +0900 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes: > Because while I think a non-pinned "latest" sucks because it forces us > to scramble with updates like this, having a "pinned" image go away > entirely (because nobody noticed we should update it sooner-than-later) > would suck more. Yeah, that matches my preference, assuming that we do not have a pre-warning to help us avoid scrambling either way. If we have such a pre-warning, I would say it may be nicer to pin a version, even if the only upside is that we can say we test with "this exact version".