From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54CC22018E for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753088AbcHZSYz (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:24:55 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:63112 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751559AbcHZSYy (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:24:54 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76B737D89; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:24:14 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=J/AneQuh2jo320oa89Zv5fNhTN4=; b=hhxRaP y6m3pdwWoxDqfKHbSotUx/T1UrVW19ATb6r+5tTVXnIURvYth9PmWY6ZdKsWcnd+ 1FrHQxZkJaJUhOAk4TueIrb2Mcoo1css4ee5dHk80K7Ltm7eXVsflRYeMPkLN16P elaN9RcdtiZS7kZ6kuctCG+8p/1fzgTAeXZWk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ewB8HRE7iiFlIbVAHmJcMlDNrP57akPF rQbypw0JUrfEy+8MZnWIaXRfH+OdSmQHZjeq1HcqXjJTxNW+Z+CHtE3SI6Efje5v K8wNKoVYIVvZ3ug6ehvI3l1FRg7/ZRh9pLrWDzl1UeFe44jdXTt4J5xTGJIZxRMr KAkpw2iauDk= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3D737D88; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:24:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B3E937D85; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:24:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Beat Bolli , Heiko Voigt , Stefan Beller Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gitk: align the commit summary format to the documentation References: <1472230741-5161-1-git-send-email-dev+git@drbeat.li> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:24:12 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1472230741-5161-1-git-send-email-dev+git@drbeat.li> (Beat Bolli's message of "Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:59:00 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4ACE8062-6BBA-11E6-B0F9-F7BB12518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Beat Bolli writes: > In 175d38c (SubmittingPatches: document how to reference previous commits, > 2016-07-28) the format for referring to older commits was specified. > > Make the text generated by the "Copy commit summary" command match this > format. Hmph. I didn't know gitk already had its own command to produce a short string. I actually think what it produces > In 175d38c ("SubmittingPatches: document how to reference previous commits", > 2016-07-28) the format for referring to older commits was specified. is easier to read when pasted into a sentence than what the recent update 175d38ca ("SubmittingPatches: document how to reference previous commits", 2016-07-28) suggests to do, i.e. > In 175d38c (SubmittingPatches: document how to reference previous commits, > 2016-07-28) the format for referring to older commits was specified. Heiko, Stefan, I think you two were involved in adding that new paragraph. What do you think?