From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A1320899 for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 16:47:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752219AbdHHQrY (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2017 12:47:24 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:50576 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752059AbdHHQrX (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Aug 2017 12:47:23 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6629A4B0; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 12:47:15 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=gG0uqttOW+dCV4FchhHgigPtXv0=; b=qTumnG VIAwgdkomyQ2zWITr8Nqdc3rY98B3ECF190sVpFAIpPJNo7EQ3a1HoX3uBS/wfBC wIWZ3XqP5/a0rg8cX7dK7ygpmo4Hv6jh9xWX3IWdy+jl+aTymzRsJ7VX9Ljn3E8X xPJJfaZ+G2IcdR671oWcAfqQHoQUzaPw6vpBE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=i9BuJgIMyIll8cGoRRcfZwHmIQQuLoal T2uCsJeD6k4jcQb89VVkfgFUDE5tohABcUsQKVpbQ9IgGzM10tZjtyd7ASribdP9 ZnMUSVvUIe6BAVfanOdJlBm3Rf72w/nVkqNw6hoq9sKQY3V+l28Z/yzTyqNgiqt9 cf3omATAZ8c= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55779A4AF; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 12:47:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 382A39A4AB; Tue, 8 Aug 2017 12:47:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Kaartic Sivaraam Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Can the '--set-upstream' option of branch be removed ? References: <20170807143938.5127-1-kaarticsivaraam91196@gmail.com> <1502197230.2071.3.camel@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 09:47:13 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1502197230.2071.3.camel@gmail.com> (Kaartic Sivaraam's message of "Tue, 08 Aug 2017 18:30:30 +0530") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3BA173E6-7C59-11E7-BC55-FE4B1A68708C-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Kaartic Sivaraam writes: > Just to be sure, you mean "die() with a good message" when you say > "fail these requests, telling them that the former option no longer is > supported." Yes. > It's pretty surprising it takes almost a decade to *stop accepting* a > bad option though many users are confused by it. > > "It's easier to do things than to undo them!" Yes, that is why we try to be extra cautious when adding new things.