From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4357C1F404 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 22:41:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751140AbeAVWlW (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:41:22 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:52844 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751037AbeAVWlV (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:41:21 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D28CB28A; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:41:20 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=JPIpYyO6jw5H5sJhmabA8WNFsZI=; b=hkvtme zogZoMlcnSRIp+CoU4uvCcyZ2XG3VDqCc2Hf/Pckz3Rv0XQuwArDeSw/oCkS9Ee3 iO65ybCJL9Pza6YhG6YAVPHxW5jhk7J6CIVSO9E/VWA4r/KHVwLY01dKbaJVFMkE maExayWHNEa5UmQp5xG54/hlvJTc15uyQWEic= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=VM/5fv8ysiP0WbLVf9FEMBeqL+iROJdx yQ3MYqkDJ4c0aVOZn5h2AgqEWWhF5HjoVkVS/V8HWReutUOgpsnxafZM/WvzMa3o 5QqvdRrak8s1fDhz+A9fRq4zu1Qru2o61r4hKVoXB7ujAr+qOMwofbxDYOuLlv/H 4J3/6nA49cM= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C521CB289; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:41:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4AFCCB287; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:41:19 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Randall S. Becker" Cc: Subject: Re: [Nit] Lots of enumerated type warnings References: <001601d3917b$c1ade3c0$4509ab40$@nexbridge.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 14:41:18 -0800 In-Reply-To: <001601d3917b$c1ade3c0$4509ab40$@nexbridge.com> (Randall S. Becker's message of "Fri, 19 Jan 2018 18:17:58 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 5D68C1BA-FFC5-11E7-901D-575F0C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Randall S. Becker" writes: > I'm seeing an increase in the enumerated type warnings > coming from my use of the c99 compiler for compiling git over time (loads > more for 2.16.0 compared to 2.3.7 when I took it on). What exactly do these "warnings" complain about? Without knowing that, the remainder of your question cannot be answered. Does it complain against enum FOO {A,B,C,} saying that the comma after C is not kosher in older C standard, for example?