From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_DKIM_INVALID shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2761F597 for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2018 22:13:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732291AbeHBABc (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2018 20:01:32 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com ([74.125.82.51]:36447 "EHLO mail-wm0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732068AbeHBABc (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2018 20:01:32 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id w24-v6so283178wmc.1 for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 15:13:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=lf7g8bSCDTtKJsPFzzcHUYDL6dq7qLxIVjuVcBzi+10=; b=CjSWzT1P+X/0uXl6zsgfnkFMv+rdt5PEPxNon14tA1tfJzi4d0f2J3/rHho9sSWu99 LF9y0IEmZcShaQrSOE5qjmAtOc8q60mKnBRW9R03d83Qhmdjw/99FYV0oj9ee7PLHXEj o/XvPI19kAm732WnJbFyeOJA2nSvCrfHfIyz/oBp16XIOdrVgn13n5RhvkI4bNBB44qV gOtcmjLAQaNni72Xcky1FHql1aFcJPtPyRteiu4PnyXaPxVasGEiyjvdi5FP/vcyStmF 68r5j6d/JqYYQx8fC+sPKGhMHZCQan2Acrp+dBVvxlHODstSuStWQzxdP8MCbEArGlOm RsLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=lf7g8bSCDTtKJsPFzzcHUYDL6dq7qLxIVjuVcBzi+10=; b=U33hphhSmi4ldJicnyn7RlPvUccSAH+cVF8sm9ynr4c5BdAaEZ/FOyn0Ru1HWFw1S9 sm1yfoLazKqmOfAwPiQMwwxLODxk/cWkHt0/vqY4l/XXB0UNBXbDNla8vS5DXcdnxQqu jU/3jhWODBPDuE8fOxw/wVY1BtfPVjsguiIY7GAnk8bRitX70F+bMLdtF4VmiRLNqfw3 C6O7+nwkFRV0kaBGjIiZTfzD0xxR9cpwRhOamO9q2QipQ7SeKPwOnHLoY8K2J6MPHzzD 5PbAtn9s9oc0Qh8CRNrC1QRX7HakgqnweWK8PyHT94qSzxGmV4lewS1gN0vfR2/brYuM xxcg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlF1bbYqz0EzCEhqiiNqwy50C4V6X0mkYYJRJyWqdXCv3NZRFKQb qLUP4e6eX63ON7d2gjd9C+MycAdK X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpdT9jS1Q/n8u5E8diNBm1X/n59ifWh1zghaIuPu50dgBY1lrkRVFdK6cWTjvMd3nr48vANZqA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:ee15:: with SMTP id m21-v6mr207618wmh.112.1533161614217; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 15:13:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (112.68.155.104.bc.googleusercontent.com. [104.155.68.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i205-v6sm302205wmf.30.2018.08.01.15.13.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 01 Aug 2018 15:13:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Derrick Stolee Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sunshine Subject: Re: ds/multi-pack-index (was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2018, #03; Wed, 25)) References: Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 15:13:33 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Derrick Stolee's message of "Wed, 1 Aug 2018 16:53:01 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Derrick Stolee writes: > On 7/25/2018 6:13 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> * ds/multi-pack-index (2018-07-20) 23 commits >> ... >> Ready to move to 'next', with some known issues to be followed up? >> cf. > I'm not sure if there is anything actionable for me to do in response > to this message. As I said elsewhere, "cf. " list does not attempt to be a complete enumeration of things to be fixed. It is a (sub)set of pointers into list archive to help me in integration cycles to decide if I can comfortably merge each topic to 'next' (or update "What's cooking" to mark the topic as "Will merge"). FWIW, that particular message is not even an objection ;-) It was telling the future-me "hey, I looked at this series and found nothing wrong in it, so no need to read them again to refresh your memory". The other one is a good reminder, again, given primarily to future-me, that the topic is known to be imperfect and the discussion seemed to favor moving "with some known issues to be followed up", so I should not waste time re-reading and poke the same holes.