From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_DKIM_INVALID shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143111F404 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 17:51:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728204AbeIQXUD (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2018 19:20:03 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com ([209.85.128.49]:37028 "EHLO mail-wm1-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727052AbeIQXUC (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2018 19:20:02 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id n11-v6so10628061wmc.2 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 10:51:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NcHVzUyjJT1VnUOOyn9qA1hWsT6eBqcsGfe1nIsftoQ=; b=cW1QJMpiA3BPIENYj0IkITTQtsoEy+DX0yy/23b+rhSPWAUjttBTrqKWnGFtOanJ0x kfk2nhF2xzzfbmevEHxfwaZWT94612BMEgoZj8wLOEhII31FkkiGH5APNJXB8XGGw40k IYvt/jlxm4ZLpPvybpd50OER5wxwyJ8Nv/Ayg9GV2ncQeHfdmrpLUE/I0QwGOzJJBal5 APi+c1p+r68xO7VLLBQu8QvCMCrnd6exCyFx8Kb7DlpZ623V2vnBoxfuAmbiAlQXt/5K HrGvF7hHvVdf/eTHHUv+/P2fynwXpba8o2sQaj+249sxvg0NRNxL4z6R+38yFK1Xz2FE 4EmQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NcHVzUyjJT1VnUOOyn9qA1hWsT6eBqcsGfe1nIsftoQ=; b=R7b2GCGrOCcEqQ0VGNlcp9bZINIlw51pGVRIciH0RmfbLT73okDTwStuzhfeFYjNLV fRyRTm9CPiu/T9bc1vUXmA7S0kZ1hvFhOtRWAMh0ubs6/5N1Mv5WBYQWt7XtANSfwrZ7 qmSkn5EFz8wvVcyEaWXF2BSvZnD8qDEDA4EavIWaWQEHVBTIISh29EH3Tm2hr5GWMQDO cAVrQZLfbNI6kPgJh98wA5hrWW/PxSRz0Kmh2188u0Q6RArV0nhIhvyegI+cFZdpuvbE 8RxSmk9lseQTE1R6v7FXpe7KYAt1PeeKQmwPT6QcvZGMSMTVha6AADed+cQZIDwK6cCT pCCw== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BnwhpVr8AgmyRxdDM7YzxDhd/nRaWPWOR1cDUtMLnRDJxHLS3j vKXV5m6+p6UTbuFgaouWLR4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdYNlwukmCgMtvE4imOtrS3WaaIhuy78SynhpwmEe8s3v0U3Ed2qi9icJ2IuAcv+kJIoFCgHaQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:e0d7:: with SMTP id x206-v6mr12713843wmg.74.1537206696195; Mon, 17 Sep 2018 10:51:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (168.50.187.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.187.50.168]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l12-v6sm13793275wrv.29.2018.09.17.10.51.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 17 Sep 2018 10:51:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Duy Nguyen , Jonathan Nieder , Git Mailing List , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnI=?= =?utf-8?B?w7A=?= Bjarmason Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2018, #03; Fri, 14) References: <20180917023912.GC22024@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 10:51:35 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20180917023912.GC22024@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Sun, 16 Sep 2018 22:39:13 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: >> > What's the donness of this one? >> > cf. <20180717201348.GD26218@sigill.intra.peff.net> >> >> This topic has stayed in 'pu' for a long time. I thought it was >> concluded that this was a good change? Jeff, Jonathan? > > I read over the thread again. I don't think I actually have any > complaints about the patches as-is. There was some discussion from Junio > and Ævar about the third one. I don't have a strong opinion. My > experience has been that "gc --auto" is garbage anyway on the server > side, but I think Ævar's experience is that it's reasonable for small to > medium sites (which seems plausible to me). > > The message-id quoted there is my "this looks good". I mentioned a few > possible nits, but I think it would be OK with or without them > addressed. That matches my reading of your position. I tend to agree with Ævar's recommendation to postpone 3/3 and use 1 & 2 for now. By the way, people shouldn't read too much into the messages referred to in "What's cooking"; they are not "these messages point out all the issues that block the topic". It's just "I am aware of this thread, which readers would hopefully find a good starting point to form their opinions". Thanks.