From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E781F87F for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 03:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731424AbeKNNHK (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2018 08:07:10 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:54320 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727065AbeKNNHK (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2018 08:07:10 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA9A228B72; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 22:05:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=QqzXL6EZJTT8MnYctnOE16ei+Qk=; b=VE7zaG D3b+cuVPNaTucVU7puNSb66mzRODMd9cyW2g2Oud5AOjVPs6Q6AL+LtFuI3cj1Le b3bP4MSICd2cjKFVntgSlDMpaj2EVW7itQb+mTHGUjm3VrtX+ISWnS3FeIvD0R0H yXxhN+5UnYYKAhbPM02QX4eo/feNKlS4ARWdA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=xLDlYIYJ5nTeZAleXfHz/MnMDA+tvlOw jP+Oy8Kh3/7N/ho2UPA+Gs2WHKPR2MARdd4qbJWg5jh9preKF8vcqRN1I0dX/bLl mhRCnlVl8Fmh0tlCxpUsW7oh2fuZ1ogi1Ui9xZcLMexSVpdK3VnEL9xpEVRsCFCd SapKbcpJZkQ= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A366228B71; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 22:05:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.155.68.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 479BC28B70; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 22:05:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Ben Peart Cc: Jonathan Nieder , git@vger.kernel.org, pclouds@gmail.com, Ben Peart Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ieot: default to not writing IEOT section References: <20180823154053.20212-1-benpeart@microsoft.com> <20181010155938.20996-1-peartben@gmail.com> <20181113003817.GA170017@google.com> <20181113003938.GC170017@google.com> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 12:05:49 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Ben Peart's message of "Tue, 13 Nov 2018 10:22:44 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 315FE55C-E7BA-11E8-AA20-F5C31241B9FE-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Ben Peart writes: > Why introduce a new setting to disable writing the IEOT extension > instead of just using the existing index.threads setting? But index.threads is about what the reader does, not about the writer who does not even know who will be reading the resulting index, no?