From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DE31F463 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 19:57:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731905AbfIIT5U (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Sep 2019 15:57:20 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:63947 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731185AbfIIT5U (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Sep 2019 15:57:20 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5E52AFDC; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 15:57:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ymFSHNcHKnhUPU09GCGuyxd9I5E=; b=DjBaea CsDFC9Dm1C8CpNMcuP5JSVQjU8e+yW/MfSzy88LucQt+JE09ys0CnZZeysozcaE6 CIhGawI9fUOmuWffPBAFsCVoIvQ0WprWH/vlRWgtf5uhIH7LhOL0W2gZLpRZiG91 i0JJZUVvYs0wy4l9xYhdsBp1Jg64gnt6ZmbkU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=QH4PyMGhGnLEG3fQSREz1+nB4mIxsy50 v0Ni4YmKTkGHgR6fYDWKKpnsh7oItoY9E2sY+nVM1SDD+MV6XEj8AIlkT5L/6Ivn bw/wMafM4hTOsWSW+7x95qa+sIjXyFdfcJ7J8RhJtY+vO4KmaE69XoNsJocsphjy WXfkRBSvt+M= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293002AFDA; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 15:57:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E28D2AFD8; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 15:57:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Denton Liu Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2019, #01; Sat, 7) References: <20190909185829.GA88988@dentonliu-ltm.internal.salesforce.com> Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 12:57:17 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20190909185829.GA88988@dentonliu-ltm.internal.salesforce.com> (Denton Liu's message of "Mon, 9 Sep 2019 11:58:29 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 074A6080-D33C-11E9-B7B5-D1361DBA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Denton Liu writes: > Hi Junio, > > On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 10:26:53AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> * dl/complete-cherry-pick-revert-skip (2019-08-27) 3 commits >> - status: mention --skip for revert and cherry-pick >> - completion: add --skip for cherry-pick and revert >> - completion: merge options for cherry-pick and revert >> >> The command line completion support (in contrib/) learned about the >> "--skip" option of "git revert" and "git cherry-pick". >> >> Will merge to 'next'. > > Did we end up deciding whether or not we were going to drop "status: > mention --skip for revert and cherry-pick"? If you are not convinced it is a good idea, we can easily drop it (and I do not mind dropping it---I am not convinced it is a good idea myself). >> * dl/remote-save-to-push (2018-12-11) 1 commit >> - remote: add --save-to-push option to git remote set-url >> >> "git remote set-url" learned a new option that moves existing value >> of the URL field to pushURL field of the remote before replacing >> the URL field with a new value. >> >> Anybody who wants to champion this topic? >> I am personally not yet quite convinced if this is worth pursuing. > > Perhaps it's time to drop this topic? OK. Thanks.