From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C7E1F466 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729654AbgAPUSF (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:18:05 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:65512 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727065AbgAPUSE (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:18:04 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A35237C3C; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:18:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=huOvDPifoDglzKb+67F+9n2R5Gk=; b=vVCb4I i1ZglQdFL7HFdzZNHDk10xcytZMdO1cACCkzMyiO70VEuzb0BFRPxdzpB8zHj9S+ 8FllbXaQFGVtGXlHPmpXaYgznL9CPePhbw5m2ZpRZ/weTUSVHUnDbzzks3tYyv/H eZmQtd1h7eYgRgu5Ys02er4MmgpI1wZ2FMaZE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=tM5Z0TO2moF0f/lffzpr+r6jSR1LCeUi 4dNU13k8FIEO0PRjwjaSybx5Gdgt4oJvLzbJ7s3gGaeogWXn/V+YVnA/B7Rav7S0 zW7T9BKmVpSgztg3QhSFpl/aklPhgvlyqw5iV96jHKjFu5eDXYpCR3l5S/43W0SV UK9k71HVKdI= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB4537C3B; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:18:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 92A9837C3A; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:17:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] msvc: accommodate for vcpkg's upgrade to OpenSSL v1.1.x References: Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:17:58 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Thu, 16 Jan 2020 11:24:52 +0100 (CET)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4A524CAA-389D-11EA-8A4A-C28CBED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: >> Should this patch directly go to 'master' (or even 'maint' for v2.25 >> maintenance track)? I do not see much point in cooking it in 'next' >> for an extended period of time. > > That would be nice. As long as this patch is not merged, we will be stuck > with failing Azure Pipelines. OK, so let's take it to 'maint' directly and merge it down to 'master' (and all the "more recent" integration branches). Thanks.