From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B91321F5AE for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 22:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729132AbgGGW3o (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 18:29:44 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:55224 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727895AbgGGW3n (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 18:29:43 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D2B70BBB; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 18:29:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=sfSnpcDPFJLyIUts7aFT0CP0YV4=; b=yYw293 MCZSVeYORdVXYqgG2Xl8QbROkJLwB7KcKWlsNMb3oAtE+PpInNXvDcHKwKXk2zpd yy+Wzh0FdTI5tGrYGqdbkbEfcua57mZAHDe48A6ZX/PvNlcSB8jwx5aWsUtZbchz RR2lKP04bxo1QOODMJAfokYJ1tIdAev6ctKj8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Q72xe2YNjYz/m9wIc7FX5kvYDAfQ46br z34Kz2YGvrIyZSXucE0UEtcrd1TVVDBfA2QaDIrGop+0q9gcHe3UhovteRjhbI3W jNR51T2BKNjLBFmVegZgY3tnp4PtA22cEaSr3nVl6GgB7V/MJIPB/Z+SzbM/TmWZ 0+5yCynRcWs= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AAD070BBA; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 18:29:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.231.104.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 020E170BB8; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 18:29:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Denton Liu Cc: Git Mailing List , Eric Sunshine Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/5] t: replace incorrect test_must_fail usage (part 6) References: <20200707222155.GA27311@generichostname> Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 15:29:40 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200707222155.GA27311@generichostname> (Denton Liu's message of "Tue, 7 Jul 2020 18:21:55 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 59647862-C0A1-11EA-B220-C28CBED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Denton Liu writes: > Thanks. For the final version of this series, we should either queue > your patch or the one I just sent[0] just after the patch for t7107 so > that it comes before the we flip the switch on test_must_fail and also > so that the patches show up in increasing numerical order. Ah, our mails crossed. Surely the fix to cvs test must come before the final step that tightens the test_must_fail helper.