From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E23CF1F4B4 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:39:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728383AbgIXQjP (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:39:15 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:59244 "EHLO pb-smtp20.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726458AbgIXQjP (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:39:15 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D13E1184; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:39:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=wGZA+AMOuGeeWDbFG+MO86SSgIs=; b=kMpED8 LPI5UY+fs6udk29WPzuRGQPGhICWbEhuoVvil94U+Hb+EiDqhbCQcW6tPUNX+acG P0YF7d2hVtj9D+/M89QflZgj3ufnS9JzdnasLPJTlnDQbImWPhl1ZBKRqVbpI+EV OjMnkvKZwYPiq8lAW9zu74iWAKjVKs+epc7rA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=v8hCl/JVikaUFFrEKW9UCmBq92s8Pkn7 ydpN274JzvN+AQxPYoLGNMBoAIWZYvM7FdOPqeO2aKHRMboczuXVcUUfy/FD/wOi NAuerr3SG4HE6olrBncBwcLG3y79qj3TZ55dGNOO7dkJ7ZJLqlE1wqBmwV3iH2w4 wDKITaES0tc= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80513E1182; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:39:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CAE67E117F; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:39:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Christian Couder , git , Christian Couder , Miriam Rubio Subject: Re: [PATCH] bisect: don't use invalid oid as rev when starting References: <20200923170915.21748-1-chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:39:07 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Thu, 24 Sep 2020 09:51:17 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 79104A44-FE84-11EA-B7C7-F0EA2EB3C613-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: >> Hopefully the V2 I just sent will be better anyway. > > FWIW I was working off of Miriam's `git-bisect-work-part2-v8` branch at > https://gitlab.com/mirucam/git.git. > > I'm happy with Christian's v2 (with or without the indentation fixes I > suggested). Thanks, both of you. The updated one does look good.