From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35511F4B4 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 20:14:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1831041AbgJ0UOa (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 16:14:30 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:60736 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1831037AbgJ0UO3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 16:14:29 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59729806EA; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 16:14:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=rh26ZWGCKUBOxigIYnMWgSgMnKo=; b=aHaSuT L6AeWwc5KbgwhBRlcYC5fhBBi4VKUeWrPhlEgqPer1PYULjzYjpUJ7QodSLcxjU9 LOJXXHKNHLhMCJ1kUzwjdGR+WkjHFvI8oKWsKu1FkusMpE5vbRouBeL76zomM0w2 nuazdjrDQAT1n0s8EvwmqyVG9Ce+bdsPMP+SY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=TNpLHVPfhwrKU764JnuXPNomaNqGqNR3 4gVNA5JVx7KcOfRd3ruaAV/4T6asywiiUBjwGBRNjypFTn8qqkcq5AtG6WOWb2tf 0VjFDDI3PMM5MAyQvt7Hp6CK88dkOZbWHwFP+CJfUAij3CKmgRJme3E7qq0DKy7+ f5k/9ftC2ec= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC34806E9; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 16:14:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4816806E8; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 16:14:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Felipe Contreras Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, SZEDER =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/29] completion: zsh: latest patches References: <20201025031343.346913-1-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 13:14:26 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20201025031343.346913-1-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> (Felipe Contreras's message of "Sat, 24 Oct 2020 22:13:14 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 03412136-1891-11EB-9B54-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Felipe Contreras writes: > I've been carrying around these patches for quite some time, many have already > been sent, others I refactored to make them more clear. > > But what is clear is that they are needed. I see a lot of people in different > forums (e.g. Stack Overflow, Oh-My-Zsh, etc.) getting bit by many of these > issues. Is this "v2" an update to the 14-patch series you have a late reply to? There is a tiny zsh completion patch in flight, but hopefully it can be rebased on this series and graduate together, provided if zsh users on the list find the topic as a whole agreeable. Thanks.