From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8221F9FC for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2021 01:35:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230493AbhC1Bem (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Mar 2021 21:34:42 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:59260 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230464AbhC1BeY (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Mar 2021 21:34:24 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73EBA8AF2; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 21:34:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=K/xn5kG6X4yFpBcEJGv8iWWUg8M=; b=GmxhUX qC+s/vJ/rsoiMZId+5Sc+sMAl9tiW9kLn9rVkduIxVIo0a6Na2WzxfitA7c9PTdk zLV6rqHyRF+x9MVi5etJQl8iWglbFsH2YFqtgYF8H61zEfpZWJGg+s+zBTrQ5PPo /luNCHNxrARCiMAq2GAlwZd/QhwTfFNI8I2yQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=k+9wkUZfxGpeYogPIYPJx9DdkfTv94x8 QfHhiKa0bi5LkjYREhuKJUA5TtLG8Ztj2W6r6kMozK01LqbgJaAsVc+X7wmybosG sUzoAcgEakXKCIdZn3K8DDGVv+nYORCUVCwe0unNEH4uuZywgD2//7u8+QGxhDmP s0uKIUJEIUo= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A021AA8AF1; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 21:34:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AB80A8AF0; Sat, 27 Mar 2021 21:34:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Philip Oakley Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] doc lint: fix bugs in, simplify and improve lint script References: Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2021 18:34:22 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Philip Oakley's message of "Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:48:45 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B9858252-8F65-11EB-AA95-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Philip Oakley writes: >> diff --git a/Documentation/Makefile b/Documentation/Makefile >> index 7313956d73f..6bfd8c75772 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/Makefile >> +++ b/Documentation/Makefile >> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ MAN5_TXT = >> MAN7_TXT = >> HOWTO_TXT = >> INCLUDE_TARGETS_TXT = >> +ALL_TXT = > > Maybe LINT_TXT would better clarify its use, rather than squatting on > the generic "ALL"? As long as it is truly "all the .txt files" and will stay that way, and the set of files we lint happens to be "everything under the sun", I am OK to have this as ALL_TXT. We may in the future want to do something other than running lint-foo scripts to all the .txt files.