From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, LIST_MIRROR_RECEIVED,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_CSS,URIBL_CSS_A shortcircuit=no autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28C21F852 for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 20:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238679AbiBDUyk (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2022 15:54:40 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:61457 "EHLO pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232318AbiBDUyj (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Feb 2022 15:54:39 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48027174B76; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 15:54:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=AcitVHoljxPu 1JpmPZjMqPC9bJ/1dboKF0dFUwm1Hos=; b=BrYJfNqExONf5ppv5uw1aNeX18+W yxJGXOdo14TtFNwcEbR8HNb3go5bLjNdFCg0LSIOvYeLO9mZNDmBGTyTdeRktDOB ZpheEXQKdJUKdBMfq6vE0A2NG3fcXNuesE/ZZd2IlcFwAjQ5ZsLB0/iN7Gf62fw2 HWKF3VJ97NbXipk= Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41EFF174B75; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 15:54:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.133.2.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1795174B73; Fri, 4 Feb 2022 15:54:36 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Han Xin , Jiang Xin , =?utf-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9?= Scharfe , Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/11] object API: correct "buf" v.s. "map" mismatch in *.c and *.h References: Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 12:54:35 -0800 In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?B?IsOGdmFyIEFybmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Fri, 4 Feb 2022 14:51:19 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A9B9905A-85FC-11EC-AFC4-CBA7845BAAA9-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: > Change the name of the second argument to check_object_signature() to > be "buf" in object-file.c, making it consistent with the prototype in > cache..h Double dot X-<.