From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85AE41F8C4 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 18:27:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S245720AbiCWS2s (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2022 14:28:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45606 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231986AbiCWS2r (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2022 14:28:47 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41A9E7892F for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 11:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039B81292C8; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 14:27:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ZRhr8B7cnpu0aZ0bpF1+XDZTI+/TAg+zRrPPZ+ ySST8=; b=IjwPM0koiI3ynhLOJMXLYIbuuC5mSthX3EaaAXq1l+B6rl4bZCRI8V 8zeS7VThWCv7y2HTGt/fPh8W6LIG2GFds66rcUo+s8EaPqrLZhsGjUxbp4pbu5Y3 VXGe8JBiVVYl17bECGpahCypEkywCYEfeKrGHuUT8j0mcW8czbX+4= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8911292C7; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 14:27:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.227.145.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 548501292C6; Wed, 23 Mar 2022 14:27:15 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Taylor Blau Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2022, #04; Thu, 17) References: Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2022 11:27:14 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Taylor Blau's message of "Mon, 21 Mar 2022 21:25:53 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: DD446AA4-AAD6-11EC-BEF7-5E84C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Taylor Blau writes: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 04:34:27AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> * tb/cruft-packs (2022-03-02) 17 commits >> >> A mechanism to pack unreachable objects into a "cruft pack", >> instead of ejecting them into loose form to be reclaimed later, has >> been introduced. >> >> Waiting for discussion to settle. >> cf. >> source: > > I responded to Jonathan's message here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/git/YjkjaH61dMLHXr0d@nand.local/ > > and I think it should be settled now. In an earlier thread, there was > some discussion about whether or not a repository format extension is > required. An extension is explicitly not required here, since the > implementation of cruft packs was designed to avoid such a thing (see > [1] for details on "why"). I think yesterday is the last message in that thread? Let's see how well it goes. Thanks.