From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: An idea for "git bisect" and a GSoC enquiry Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 11:31:19 -0700 Message-ID: References: <530F1F11.7060403@alum.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Michael Haggerty , Git Mailing List , Christian Couder To: Jacopo Notarstefano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 12 19:31:28 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WNnw6-0004uP-Uk for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 19:31:27 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756125AbaCLSbX (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:31:23 -0400 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:42578 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755848AbaCLSbW (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:31:22 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BD971C7D; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:31:22 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=RFQBmkHgghKYW+P+alklbcWqRCQ=; b=sCx7ZM 5SSj+2joMnawSThsDTUvTJtMwo2RSx+2nBBRM9w6i35L5+/p+IIFBA1koJLzMms8 EQJQIyj7Fl5YvUbMbdSG0DmdsduqLcKVlApy1yJevQto0zPX8jXqVc8amGgr8l7W Al3J37lF1+5wsULc/SrIOH3YtCToFVds+oetk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=rYWQ3/2RFGwp4Gkuhg3yO5QLl0mX8Gmc GM4UJgb4TQZOsQfvAL6JkiNL67cTf6UdOnKHJgDQnYlSTTNcwvPLcWOnv18b5m1o RnNyNoVTloQu5B1TaEqRVe2Et5TNGEhPO/CAi36xw5eHcXoPxKS49+2MNw5yfYzv vkfMtdYLBpQ= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC45F71C7C; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:31:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [72.14.226.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8EAD71C79; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:31:20 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Jacopo Notarstefano's message of "Wed, 12 Mar 2014 02:32:39 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 82138F32-AA14-11E3-B3CC-8D19802839F8-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jacopo Notarstefano writes: > On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> I think you fundamentally cannot use two labels that are merely >> "distinct" and bisect correctly. You need to know which ones >> (i.e. good) are to be excluded and the other (i.e. bad) are to be >> included when computing the "remaining to be tested" set of commits. > > Good point. Yes, this isn't viable. But if you make them into --no-longer-X vs --still-X, then it will be viable without us knowing what X means.