From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9451F744 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:44:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932263AbcGKSom (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:44:42 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:51054 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752334AbcGKSom (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:44:42 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C920A2C021; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:44:40 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=0qR5aDI79uWFU51bPlZqTQ7Oa9w=; b=mizkXZ fSJ5dMZpXhEUGFvLBcGDZtxuLovCiHYtksa5sLHQxocFh5ttOEzyP83Q1q2kGCGq i+c6ecpLCjVureWLy8wx/gR1CDQdkS/fItyoPrO0Cjew1GvXZbGBlM/t9bhmuOZY lZXkniqc+VgmkjFwD1KNxzEPW7qghCqlQoEyM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Jn7bVO/Dcs32Sss3uX4yVKJ+GJ1Gxv5b urrlHSYddH1iY+PU3CPkFesYPoEV44GR8oJWfjn2x2Qob39WReChiw4wF2f5ogGR vnGbGJrdxpBKLD2Dd2tHqhWMyA9QLXSTmyd08tKNtpqJ+yQq3tbsWzflgWnahJfi WI2T46tQfbE= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16DB2C020; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:44:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44C2C2C01F; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:44:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: "brian m. carlson" Cc: Eric Wong , Ronald Wampler , git@vger.kernel.org, mackyle@gmail.com, reubenhwk@gmail.com, sunshine@sunshineco.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] config.mak.uname: define NEEDS_LIBRT under Linux, for now References: <20160707204554.14961-1-rdwampler@gmail.com> <20160710221644.GA4927@whir> <20160711103653.GA29598@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:44:38 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160711103653.GA29598@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> (brian m. carlson's message of "Mon, 11 Jul 2016 10:36:53 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 868081C4-4797-11E6-8163-EE617A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "brian m. carlson" writes: > On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 10:16:44PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: >> My Debian wheezy LTS system is still on glibc 2.13; and LTS >> distros may use older glibc, still, so lets not unnecessarily >> break things out-of-the-box. >> >> We seem to assume Linux is using glibc in our Makefiles anyways, >> so I don't think this will introduce new breakage for users of >> alternative libc implementations. > > This is a good idea. If it's broken with Debian wheezy, it will also be > broken for RHEL/CentOS 6. People who really want the slimmest linkage > can use the -Wl,--as-needed flag. Thanks all, will apply.