From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.4 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C6C2018F for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:43:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751145AbcGMUny (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2016 16:43:54 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:51974 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750975AbcGMUnw (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2016 16:43:52 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445A62B19C; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 16:43:51 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=CmmBRBJQx6ISJA+RYQkiMkk36qs=; b=b6N0dr BNBf8raljfD8MrieONHAbBouy4faX9e/UBxnolMQTqkP79i5RXoYLZ7a2oNNHva+ xRkquiZe13XwiukwO+Vm0UEFlG7FRjUDnQARRCD2yAli2YpIVz5nhKH2fDROZSoq b2Ea+eK3106cwaMDnYzKlLFnHtt8kY7pelmIE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ubR8E0uwZ75VTBXCTrsqsB0Hpjou5VvZ lp+saC3pyNUWL4DXRqIG7d7BzXyZxf6wOGyy8FyFu5go4x6vSH8SATLccXp8LVNy oSQ4hIS5pUNrFYOyUdsa3jJfWCK6+/5bAmMIjEcxiEl9gNz1VaEYvjERg0Vn3K35 CzvKLSbHiaY= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0F32B19B; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 16:43:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5E5B2B19A; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 16:43:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Lars Schneider Cc: Jeff King , Andreas Schwab , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.9.1 References: <87lh17kgdy.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <20160711235417.GA26163@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 13:43:48 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:59:51 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 814CD028-493A-11E6-A994-EE617A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > It is somewhat disturbing that nobody seems to be regularly building > on 32-bit platforms these days, which is the only reason I can think > of why this was never reported until it hit a maintenance track. > This should have been caught last week at f6a729f3 (Merge branch > 'jk/tzoffset-fix', 2016-07-06) when the topic hit 'master' at the > latest, and more preferrably it should have already been caught last > month at 08ec8c5e (Merge branch 'jk/tzoffset-fix' into next, > 2016-06-28). > > Those who care about 32-bit builds need to start building and > testing 'next' and 'master' regularly, or similar breakages are > bound to continue happening X-<. > > Volunteers? We might eventually see a volunteer or two but that hasn't happened yet, at least in the past few days. Does Travis CI testing have an option to run our tests on some 32-bit platforms?