From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7732021F for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 20:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933192AbcHBU0G (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 16:26:06 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:63978 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933179AbcHBU0B (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 16:26:01 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC3A335D2; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 16:25:59 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=aSX0Eykz7C9AFZcTiGWpL+Y6MHs=; b=UOhXUh 6OAvMwu5ENwoZM+eI+4J17BDy/fmtS+eT7Jfzc46MC601wagrKsDPc6navpl03Z5 bXhdzslNymuOorY2KCl1nhpr8BIIxfFeEzlSmw9vB7PQSZG2f/k32V1xZ3efTm4R yx4MpkdLW5bPE4xD/DkU2SA1Fri2ei7h6sTsA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=PQaQ+qBJZCmyag/ulZUfUsQ+gwjVITvc sES0lP4MXhd4F5EgNVrWfdfu+MeTRhNiGRecrE+k/P4Ght4sPgbz9vhLy4xYi8Pb YGBMb015FKvwy8uoIXG1FLYFG9WqAHlVSc7XXUQJReDdJWe24gUTUA48bf9CZP8b PeFayiBpbCE= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F85335D1; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 16:25:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B33E335D0; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 16:25:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Pranit Bauva Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v11 09/13] bisect--helper: `bisect_write` shell function in C References: <0102015640423c26-2060fd70-c90d-4de3-ae8c-1801ad160b1c-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> <0102015640423cf7-078bef36-54e8-4200-9097-17d95d4f3c40-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 13:25:57 -0700 In-Reply-To: <0102015640423cf7-078bef36-54e8-4200-9097-17d95d4f3c40-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> (Pranit Bauva's message of "Sun, 31 Jul 2016 09:21:38 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 52C680B8-58EF-11E6-9E5D-89D312518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Pranit Bauva writes: > Reimplement the `bisect_write` shell function in C and add a > `bisect-write` subcommand to `git bisect--helper` to call it from > git-bisect.sh Up to around this step we've seen these patches well enough and I think with another reroll or two, they are in good enough shape to be split out and frozen for 'next'. We may not be there quite yet, but I think we are getting pretty close. Thanks.