From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D396020705 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 16:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758165AbcIHQSG (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2016 12:18:06 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:52932 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757951AbcIHQSG (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Sep 2016 12:18:06 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827DF3AA44; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 12:18:04 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=s4isznJv+nv8sYnAv2Nw/9J12zE=; b=J5wfRY P/xKaL/n34k+x2ctOD34yXx8Io6iqBuE7T2GHDIf26OrSZfHAEKZSliTw+kotwnc OCZMYM9zo4gD6VwhGtkpNmUs1pdnoktG3G6igzUCkd2CRTxJQA50zBPpy+PivLw3 svKeeRhXe/XfDzdf8b/ttn5s+hNUxY4sdOcHU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=PredDykBC8hbSP2f7H9ttCPh6n0ffvSz 0zQ2hg4PwL4o5Ri3izmlzPo5jyTtjMUyWbN0wxPinmk1IAj/GO9195MnKeOCULdt ogIo1f4BKV2yrWCUsaiACDGfhx9WpPsuHioV9ccR0GIxk9vYjA9ieIGX+k2/lG2p HSvikRvY9VY= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D653AA43; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 12:18:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D70A13AA42; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 12:18:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jonathan Nieder Cc: Jonathan Tan , git@vger.kernel.org, spearce@spearce.org, sbeller@google.com, peff@peff.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] connect: advertized capability is not a ref References: <4b09bb7a5b7f4eb5fc31df3d98ce7ffc042eb367.1473291819.git.jonathantanmy@google.com> <20160908013431.GC25016@google.com> Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 09:18:01 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160908013431.GC25016@google.com> (Jonathan Nieder's message of "Wed, 7 Sep 2016 18:34:31 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D1CF5DDC-75DF-11E6-AD47-51057B1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jonathan Nieder writes: > I think we can make this stricter. The capabilities^{} line is supposed > to be the first advertised ref, before any 'shallow' lines or .have > extra refs. "The first", or "the first and only"? I thought that it would be the latter.