From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07AFA1F43C for ; Thu, 9 Nov 2017 04:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751831AbdKIEUj (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2017 23:20:39 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:53688 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751495AbdKIEUi (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2017 23:20:38 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788319FED2; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 23:20:35 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=cfg9xa8lKQjA2ZHiOonMCgH1U50=; b=lTYqII 8ccs7+q8JWPTTJuan5uwP3C7ljQ1VlAiufMMpu/cKXPYNROyOiIxgBQvK1Cg5QZM pTgFQdfnsIqmJv9IoKKakdXQJb3hbvvL/4Cn9xpmwboJ2vm2i0o8KnKZXouHWlXO TvHl51b40XdicM2i8Ch/lpAHD9y/CdJE+CiAM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=I4CopfFEQK4mS5Kgn31QCVCuOLmL/yWz 5W5p7m4AS+gSu6vrC/AFKfkvG8KR1p82jL9O5rFoGMD9bRMS4Jn2yYlL1u1enNIl qsY6SVUyVyEjCD7ub19Pjyk7a36FT83CogsSFzQZ+QQMxyLgzqjCLdp7LVCBhlDe HYke76X3Aeg= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7116E9FED0; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 23:20:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB52F9FECD; Wed, 8 Nov 2017 23:20:34 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Todd Zullinger Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Pat Thoyts Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Replace Free Software Foundation address in license notices References: <20171107053933.23370-1-tmz@pobox.com> Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2017 13:20:33 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20171107053933.23370-1-tmz@pobox.com> (Todd Zullinger's message of "Tue, 7 Nov 2017 00:39:33 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 5501B52C-C505-11E7-B37F-8EF31968708C-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Todd Zullinger writes: > The mailing address for the FSF has changed over the years. Rather than > updating the address across all files, refer readers to gnu.org, as the > GNU GPL documentation now suggests for license notices. The mailing > address is retained in the full license files (COPYING and LGPL-2.1). > > The old address is still present in t/diff-lib/COPYING. This is > intentional, as the file is used in tests and the contents are not > expected to change. > > Signed-off-by: Todd Zullinger > --- This change probably makes sense. From here on after applying the patch, we won't have to worry about updating these every time they move---not that they have moved often, though ;-) > compat/obstack.c | 5 ++--- > ... > ewah/ewok_rlw.h | 3 +-- > git-gui/git-gui.sh | 3 +-- > imap-send.c | 3 +-- > ... > 44 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-) I've tried hard to keep the git-gui/ part as a separate project (it indeed is managed separately). I have been, and am still only pulling from its "upstream" repository (Pat, who is its project lead, Cc'ed), refaining from making changes that do not exist there at git://repo.or.cz/git-gui.git/ to the tree I publish. I'll separate the part from this patch that touches git-gui/* and try to arrange the next pull from git-gui repository would have the omitted part somehow. Given that the "upstream" seems to be inactive these days, we might want to change the way we manage that part of the tree, though. Thanks.