From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814C31FAE2 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 18:59:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935084AbeAIS7v (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2018 13:59:51 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:57644 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932310AbeAIS7u (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jan 2018 13:59:50 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D965FBE4A9; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 13:59:49 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=2wxigUWpIhVd5db79LF8NoTkl5U=; b=aECSQ/ gE0rgUwHBJIIJXA/Zbf4JEW1095mlRua+tX1nw9yyMqjOo+PYGRC2AvghUQveDSI VTmYuuLTssnHS9ChFktzD5y69YEzxCrGBnJ/QagqXDcWxyxgx4fNakWellI5GTnP 9CEc+moUjuyT5/orSJuKblnDgvopZfRQXRxao= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=qS4e+IbXkRlBuZJyrXeQ3hp8W58ZPWKE liCAeSa5nwNy/Lw2JWpjlN9U1IALH+MkAka7Thahg0a0gquMWB1V3u3esNLZANdZ uS9Hrp4Rh0dqRRaWA786grXUyNMTUP6FcTYwWWDQbsrc1L40LZgDJdFWvwin5K7g Qor0ByLYOm8= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CB3BE4A8; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 13:59:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A654BE4A4; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 13:59:49 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Lars Schneider Cc: Git List , Taylor Blau Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Dec 2017, #03; Wed, 13) References: Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 10:59:48 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Lars Schneider's message of "Tue, 9 Jan 2018 13:59:43 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 443E51BA-F56F-11E7-A879-575F0C78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Lars Schneider writes: >> On 14 Dec 2017, at 00:00, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> Here are the topics that have been cooking. Commits prefixed with >> '-' are only in 'pu' (proposed updates) while commits prefixed with >> '+' are in 'next'. The ones marked with '.' do not appear in any of >> the integration branches, but I am still holding onto them. >> >> You can find the changes described here in the integration branches >> of the repositories listed at >> >> http://git-blame.blogspot.com/p/git-public-repositories.html >> ... >> >> * jk/progress-delay-fix (2017-12-04) 2 commits >> (merged to 'next' on 2017-12-05 at 8e62c2b18b) >> + progress: drop delay-threshold code >> + progress: set default delay threshold to 100%, not 0% >> >> A regression in the progress eye-candy was fixed. > > Hi Junio, > > this fixes a bug that affects the Git LFS community (not only > eye-candy). Would it be possible to get this into Git 2.15.2? The topic is in 'master' and is a candidate to eventually hit the 'maint' track. I do not know if 2.15.2 is warranted, though, as we are getting closer to 2.16 and supposed to be concentrating more on regression fixes. Thanks.