From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: lars.schneider@autodesk.com
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, tboegi@web.de, j6t@kdbg.org,
sunshine@sunshineco.com, peff@peff.net,
ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com, Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de,
pclouds@gmail.com, Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 06/10] convert: add 'working-tree-encoding' attribute
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 11:10:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqmuzh5alb.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180309173536.62012-7-lars.schneider@autodesk.com> (lars schneider's message of "Fri, 9 Mar 2018 18:35:32 +0100")
lars.schneider@autodesk.com writes:
> +static const char *default_encoding = "UTF-8";
> +
> ...
> +static const char *git_path_check_encoding(struct attr_check_item *check)
> +{
> + const char *value = check->value;
> +
> + if (ATTR_UNSET(value) || !strlen(value))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (ATTR_TRUE(value) || ATTR_FALSE(value)) {
> + error(_("working-tree-encoding attribute requires a value"));
> + return NULL;
> + }
Hmph, so we decide to be loud but otherwise ignore an undefined
configuration? Shouldn't we rather die instead to avoid touching
the user data in unexpected ways?
> +
> + /* Don't encode to the default encoding */
> + if (!strcasecmp(value, default_encoding))
> + return NULL;
Is this an optimization to avoid "recode one encoding to the same
encoding" no-op overhead? We already have the optimization in the
same spirit in may existing codepaths that has nothing to do with
w-t-e, and I think we should share the code. Two pieces of thought
comes to mind.
One is a lot smaller in scale: Is same_encoding() sufficient for
this callsite instead of strcasecmp()?
The other one is a lot bigger: Looking at all the existing callers
of same_encoding() that call reencode_string() when it returns false,
would it make sense to drop same_encoding() and move the optimization
to reencode_string() instead?
I suspect that the answer to the smaller one is "yes, and even if
not, it should be easy to enhance/extend same_encoding() to make it
do what we want it to, and such a change will benefit even existing
callers." The answer to the larger one is likely "the optimization
is not about skipping only reencode_string() call but other things
are subtly different among callers of same_encoding(), so such a
refactoring would not be all that useful."
The above still holds for the code after 10/10 touches this part.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-09 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-09 17:35 [PATCH v11 00/10] convert: add support for different encodings lars.schneider
2018-03-09 17:35 ` [PATCH v11 01/10] strbuf: remove unnecessary NUL assignment in xstrdup_tolower() lars.schneider
2018-03-09 17:35 ` [PATCH v11 02/10] strbuf: add xstrdup_toupper() lars.schneider
2018-03-09 17:35 ` [PATCH v11 03/10] strbuf: add a case insensitive starts_with() lars.schneider
2018-03-09 17:35 ` [PATCH v11 04/10] utf8: add function to detect prohibited UTF-16/32 BOM lars.schneider
2018-03-09 17:35 ` [PATCH v11 05/10] utf8: add function to detect a missing " lars.schneider
2018-03-09 17:35 ` [PATCH v11 06/10] convert: add 'working-tree-encoding' attribute lars.schneider
2018-03-09 19:10 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2018-03-15 21:23 ` Lars Schneider
2018-03-18 7:24 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2018-04-01 13:24 ` Lars Schneider
2018-04-05 16:41 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2018-04-15 16:54 ` Lars Schneider
2018-03-09 17:35 ` [PATCH v11 07/10] convert: check for detectable errors in UTF encodings lars.schneider
2018-03-09 19:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-09 19:04 ` Lars Schneider
2018-03-09 19:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-09 17:35 ` [PATCH v11 08/10] convert: advise canonical UTF encoding names lars.schneider
2018-03-09 19:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-15 22:42 ` Lars Schneider
2018-03-09 17:35 ` [PATCH v11 09/10] convert: add tracing for 'working-tree-encoding' attribute lars.schneider
2018-03-09 17:35 ` [PATCH v11 10/10] convert: add round trip check based on 'core.checkRoundtripEncoding' lars.schneider
2018-03-09 20:18 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-03-09 20:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-03-09 20:27 ` Eric Sunshine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqmuzh5alb.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=lars.schneider@autodesk.com \
--cc=larsxschneider@gmail.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=ramsay@ramsayjones.plus.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=tboegi@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).