From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_DKIM_INVALID shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C0A1F42D for ; Wed, 30 May 2018 03:39:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754964AbeE3Djj (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2018 23:39:39 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:33496 "EHLO mail-wm0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752854AbeE3Dji (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 May 2018 23:39:38 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id x12-v6so168012wmc.0 for ; Tue, 29 May 2018 20:39:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=KUq6OLscqjs4sgGm8BpoBJjj5sGjPEu1q4GQm7gURpw=; b=ApRnsAIpzd6Zy847lbOC0JxTNsHQ9VS5Gqe/9XfrEBWmvvnfh037W6HS0iSEb+jTOL dTGSOAZybIr9DzkJLCDEpIg0w1AMUbUeEpA3/vri8eGvRk/t6VHrpZwKa/3eagGkrnbY v2u3occZo7C8nkenRWqUDKLDEVCu4uotAOqFei5czm7cx8mvBv9p8QJQ/+044pBy0svR hhTcWlSOis0scY25nEwLXWLktjev4VQqFlqDZOupGXmpC8C/1431x0rm3Ue0nz3Oys1v FAzJCzFwz+pNpbUDf9ec68dl7yFpdxn+np6XpZqwlA4BrF5RI8GJJYjAJiDZ/dZx4Le0 Dbdw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=KUq6OLscqjs4sgGm8BpoBJjj5sGjPEu1q4GQm7gURpw=; b=CdkzgI1VScBloFBs2m3+Sg1Pb4SGWGCf6LLy7Qksngz2a9QgAHuIvOg9yIwowFNZik kqbfFgBKdx/UcVVBA6Wrh+C9xzXCSJaehiSGpjJh8IU1qkqX8Axl38qHBx39EGwsj21z Y7mkPrQkgZXyYGHqc+V7m5UHs8KI0O9c2PJ7F9EyqIkPnCuYMQyMX3MaH+fmuHK6o2RP 6wHcmVc0PlVXwJY6bLsNO6dZoGUrzWJxteGkn4ab2dvCUMtltBhixiML/G2of6UW1JjP wXYPSjyShWbMkXGWe/IZx41NSqWMi1k2uwHQS5CFLtkklWntBqdwqnBQOewid+U2s+sz Xv4w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwcBiHQZFNskjIDNvfROxifCtsETQNb/2ydTSvFFbodAeZAqfZO3 vE5MUURbi8marNy2vt3Fy+1Vv7Lh X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKqepH/vg4ols3WPaTjhz9xUHzW6vvBxvm3w442JFY3tBBm0Bpu7EByzvwgrEmaPYMJ348Wng== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:da13:: with SMTP id r19-v6mr151587wmg.2.1527651576731; Tue, 29 May 2018 20:39:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (112.68.155.104.bc.googleusercontent.com. [104.155.68.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p5-v6sm18419257wre.83.2018.05.29.20.39.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 May 2018 20:39:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: Eric Sunshine , Git List , Jeff King , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] config doc: unify the description of fsck.* and receive.fsck.* References: <20180524193516.28713-1-avarab@gmail.com> <20180525192811.25680-1-avarab@gmail.com> <20180525192811.25680-3-avarab@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 12:39:35 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Wed, 30 May 2018 12:05:01 +0900") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > Between "fsck. makes sense only when you use these rare and > you-probably-never-heard-of tools ongoing basis" and "when you > already have (slightly)broken objects, naming each of them in > skiplist, rather than covering the class, is better because you want > *new* instances of the same breakage", I'd imagine the latter would be s/breakage/& caught/; obviously, otherwise what I typed does not make much sense. Sorry about the premature . > more helpful. > > In any case, let's see if there are more input to this topic and > then wrap it up in v3 ;-) > > Thanks.