From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6730F1F5AE for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 20:54:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726593AbgGXUye (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:54:34 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:50179 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726411AbgGXUyc (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:54:32 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37985753BC; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:54:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=TvzFt5lhl+aGWSkPqfPyLCwCvWo=; b=gAFj2S PnIxJPflN8opMdN/8SqDf2Rzw9sNrGK/m0XGX2c6p6vyDXczofLJGPZ0ISd8V8bf 7OK/N6/bNEnzO1/76PjIDKaVBP3GaZ/n/KfzG1/jdKBpKTEARKVqque0Hhn1Sn6V tA6YgvnnAfSFi/mb8ME8rA/UZdBAhtIXcPmow= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=qxzNHXFFaq2M8evtZ9osfn7NIehmgmgB 9TLHgMIdzc84YZTTd7WtbsZp5/hDGYZ16rLc2/7K/r9KrPQDZkeoQ4z3a5TVNSXc Es7miZVdotKe43qXbCqcJFdgeBhTwGC65SJQq2pJhEm6fClMyyad+/oXLNCrsBaR Gb7YeVSVuNA= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B5F753BB; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:54:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [35.196.173.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B521B753BA; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:54:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Patrick Steinhardt Cc: starlord via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Jiang Xin , starlord , Bojun Chen Subject: Re: [PATCH] githooks.txt: use correct "reference-transaction" hook name References: <20200724142156.GB1032@xps.pks.im> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:54:29 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200724142156.GB1032@xps.pks.im> (Patrick Steinhardt's message of "Fri, 24 Jul 2020 16:21:56 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: DE3CB242-CDEF-11EA-AD64-01D9BED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Patrick Steinhardt writes: > Hi Bojun, > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 01:57:57PM +0000, starlord via GitGitGadget wrote: >> From: Bojun Chen >> >> The "reference transaction" hook was introduced in commit 6754159767 >> (refs: implement reference transaction hook, 2020-06-19). The name of >> the hook is declared as "reference-transaction" in "refs.c" and >> testcases, but the name declared in "githooks.txt" is different. >> >> Signed-off-by: Bojun Chen > > Indeed, thanks for catching this! > > Reviewed-by: Patrick Steinhardt Thanks.