From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C0F1F4B4 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 21:04:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726073AbhANU6n (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:58:43 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:61145 "EHLO pb-smtp2.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727463AbhANU6n (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:58:43 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5619E246; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:58:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ESluDod6pWabV2ZZskS6k8yswn4=; b=Y08GJj LuKc80xt1tt0fcXZvVCe9Oi0OVKYsVrFTzHEWR2CynzJnB7ebx2JH8R4neufpD8w Z7XM/jFfjuPa+B1bjCYCiXKzI35qPHcFLwE4RiVCqZ7Ti1maC+djq941akD2Q1dD +Hh8ae1Dmp+/H99qPi3jcoZGESakdVlEPjq9Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=FSrUJfuvVuhTO3OY0e3fBIphWcFq3Wqr xgu+irMMm35Moou7CGgdE7z5tCnA6X81Wi+aXtX9jr9zGcB/HKf7wszt400p3THw uoUgPbrQu37X0F6asIUoeV/hOmaRt5XY0k+B3yWKu91fb2cICLgbiDvFlS2EVbir 0pU8AQYJP6g= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 499B39E244; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:58:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B883B9E243; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:57:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Taylor Blau Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, dstolee@microsoft.com, jrnieder@gmail.com, peff@peff.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] packfile: prepare for the existence of '*.rev' files References: <6742c15c84bafbcc1c06e2633de51dcda63e3314.1610576805.git.me@ttaylorr.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:57:59 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Taylor Blau's message of "Thu, 14 Jan 2021 13:13:05 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 2F4ACAF4-56AB-11EB-ACB0-74DE23BA3BAF-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Taylor Blau writes: > Your response did pique my interest, since I was wondering if we could > improve the cold cache performance if the .rev file's contents were > included in the .idx,... Yes, that was the primary thing I was wondering. As long as it was considered and rejected for good reason, that is good. Thanks.