From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D6B1F54E for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 18:27:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="pXGy6yiW"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239913AbiGNS12 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2022 14:27:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43740 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239230AbiGNS1Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2022 14:27:25 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (pb-smtp20.pobox.com [173.228.157.52]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAEA82F67F for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 11:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D515195C15; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 14:27:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=MZkS5xDhTdndsIuAPwghderHVWOUCHCQQgMOCy Qb6ek=; b=pXGy6yiWKCl0TO0YNt0AJBvZ+Z6kqG7hnS7ZTs7ooAr4E6kFTTMqiH dFbVTRcci3TKb4pRGQAKwxSRKZZgvMpdDhOoHRoThLBlM12l+sRz10X0qZvkxNEw Q+mVQGBreZYerySuI7SuHb3ZEISYvIsCEZ/qLJ7QC7cty9M+6zeT4= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3615E195C13; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 14:27:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.83.92.57]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE582195C06; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 14:27:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Johannes Schindelin Cc: Glen Choo , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: gc/bare-repo-discovery (was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2022, #03; Mon, 11)) References: <5ps2q552-1rr3-7161-4181-31556pp2ns12@tzk.qr> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 11:27:19 -0700 In-Reply-To: <5ps2q552-1rr3-7161-4181-31556pp2ns12@tzk.qr> (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Thu, 14 Jul 2022 18:17:39 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 994D375C-03A2-11ED-B601-C85A9F429DF0-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Johannes Schindelin writes: > I would find `safe.bareRepository = true` or `false` more intuitive, and > more concise. Yup, that is fine by me. > And if there should be an option to ignore bare repositories when > discovering a Git repository, it could be a tristate, with `ignore` being > the value to trigger that mode. Sounds good.