From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/6] hash-object: use fsck to check objects
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 12:59:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqmt6f4l03.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y8hX+pIZUKXsyYj5@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:35:06 -0500")
Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> [1/6]: t1007: modernize malformed object tests
Obviously good.
> [2/6]: t1006: stop using 0-padded timestamps
> [3/6]: t7030: stop using invalid tag name
These two are pleasant to see and revealed what are "accepted" by
mistake, quite surprisingly.
> [4/6]: t: use hash-object --literally when created malformed objects
The --literally option was invented initially primarily to allow a
bogus type of object (e.g. "hash-object -t xyzzy --literally") but I
am happy to see that we are finding different uses. I wonder if
these objects of known types but with syntactically bad contents can
be "repack"ed from loose into packed?
> [5/6]: fsck: provide a function to fsck buffer without object struct
Obvious, clean and very nice.
> [6/6]: hash-object: use fsck for object checks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-18 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-18 20:35 [RFC/PATCH 0/6] hash-object: use fsck to check objects Jeff King
2023-01-18 20:35 ` [PATCH 1/6] t1007: modernize malformed object tests Jeff King
2023-01-18 21:13 ` Taylor Blau
2023-01-18 20:35 ` [PATCH 2/6] t1006: stop using 0-padded timestamps Jeff King
2023-01-18 20:36 ` [PATCH 3/6] t7030: stop using invalid tag name Jeff King
2023-01-18 20:41 ` [PATCH 4/6] t: use hash-object --literally when created malformed objects Jeff King
2023-01-18 21:19 ` Taylor Blau
2023-01-19 2:06 ` Jeff King
2023-01-18 20:43 ` [PATCH 5/6] fsck: provide a function to fsck buffer without object struct Jeff King
2023-01-18 21:24 ` Taylor Blau
2023-01-19 2:07 ` Jeff King
2023-01-18 20:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] hash-object: use fsck for object checks Jeff King
2023-01-18 21:34 ` Taylor Blau
2023-01-19 2:31 ` Jeff King
2023-02-01 12:50 ` Jeff King
2023-02-01 13:08 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2023-02-01 20:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-01-18 20:46 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/6] hash-object: use fsck to check objects Jeff King
2023-01-18 20:59 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2023-01-18 21:38 ` Taylor Blau
2023-01-19 2:03 ` Jeff King
2023-01-19 1:39 ` Jeff King
2023-01-19 23:13 ` [PATCH 7/6] fsck: do not assume NUL-termination of buffers Jeff King
2023-01-19 23:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-01-21 9:36 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/6] hash-object: use fsck to check objects René Scharfe
2023-01-22 7:48 ` Jeff King
2023-01-22 11:39 ` René Scharfe
2023-02-01 14:06 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqmt6f4l03.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=l.s.r@web.de \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).