From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A126A2018E for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:41:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754278AbcGLPlr (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:41:47 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:53573 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753256AbcGLPlq (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:41:46 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F55280AC; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:41:45 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=+7y0zjvAL1dUIZ3x2+xScjgRD7w=; b=j47NtA Z8ja8L2fABq+0/QahwoPTJnKrT0/kEFbz2X94RmJoyvnUatXsn4tCfCtVJmpwDAA XpyRUknoN8ALvYO27rauUf4/ZO2+EMrBmCaKYhIyP5HN0q0BrJpMsbGn43/uq47d iYInYusZtm25LQYuht/1UU8iD4BHuBxduCnEo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=VjqaDOfNnomhjxzjBBZ0SNJaWfCne8Gz DSwcZYS86CLvbJ9S5P91tt8YAVEO42FVM7iJzp7rU22Ma6aPTdKS8y2rqLvn6mSV xytP8fRlimmcQmD7xyfdOt9yM64RbhxupGI5do76pdEs1GwAHp2t8Sol8r0CfSm8 c4mcjGIdO7g= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494DE280AB; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:41:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF88D280AA; Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:41:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Andreas Schwab , Git Mailing List Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.9.1 References: <87lh17kgdy.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <20160711235417.GA26163@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160712151630.GE613@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20160712153520.GG613@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 08:41:42 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160712153520.GG613@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 12 Jul 2016 11:35:20 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 22F8A356-4847-11E6-B333-89D312518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > I am not certain that there is a modern system with 32-bit time_t. We > know there are systems with 32-bit unsigned long, and I think that is > what produced the results people saw. I'd expect even 32-bit systems to > use "int64_t" or similar for their time_t these days. OK.