From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C9C202D7 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:33:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753855AbdCHSdu (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2017 13:33:50 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:54463 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750770AbdCHSds (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Mar 2017 13:33:48 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C926D06A; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 13:33:41 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=VEd5UMo5e/+QtzGSIQw0SC5ZJco=; b=uyop6f VF/7LpduzGrt6NrxPwy48O4zM85ef7p2vkbFkHn1/s3dSpUF6Dnm0EW1u55reT6m aouBiQvXJmCzzUzrxxw+WnXaVdAt59o2X3tiqEfThcXHUrdiZEUmesVNwle2wshw 51DYg+ONut2e9760CMgLQBVoyuud6IoJq4eRQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=axhItMWAV4pL+Z4rAtBwt8uK4jZVZsK+ nVcskAqau8FgohSN9OxCTQQy1m4iJipg/4PsRYD4LdhK9wJsuqalAiKHZe6Au8tt mp0htDSomuILmmCepIe6qtnppp11yitMobH8NgJnMLbOqUQMTiGwyKNU/XvOVEMH AAEqXV35akg= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E33D6D069; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 13:33:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D97736D067; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 13:33:40 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Guillaume Wenzek Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Karthik Nayak Subject: Re: BUG Report: git branch ignore --no-abbrev flag References: Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 10:33:39 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Guillaume Wenzek's message of "Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:14:24 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C09366D0-042D-11E7-B3C5-97B1B46B9B0B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Guillaume Wenzek writes: > After updating to git 2.12.0 on Monday I noticed that the "git branch" > wasn't behaving as usual. Are you sure you are trying 2.12? v2.12.0 and before should behave the same way and honor --no-abbrev as far as I know. On the other hand, 'master' has 93e8cd8b ("Merge branch 'kn/ref-filter-branch-list'", 2017-02-27), which seems to introduce the regression. Karthik?