From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B5661F991 for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 15:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753219AbdHIPuP (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:50:15 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:56801 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752332AbdHIPuO (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:50:14 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C0AABE89; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:50:08 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=UtqHZ5afJPbp0Yk2CHZjjkD/Ivw=; b=JPMoeW txsgsXCegARLgUx8WYdXXcl+vF7IZJVVXpaxN8A4w9LxHrF43bAvoVvCi+9yImiG 5xpVLL/hpnnC3ki+Q0fzNTASt5XWARnnWtNhR1TK8nSflkcbV9c6FJQGQT9NlcWk HSJfYby7d+sWQ/iKSFO/PXB3yq0ij66+HRkeU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=iPGq7x8wB4l77yummtUgCpqd+WsRm0XI 7l/eOoPpo/DUcaeYAcbweasgjtY3DfCf2eAw3S+MnFUHGYEnS6cV4q2FotVLKjN4 y+jt0waZs06zfX3vde0gW+ZdjN/mJBTLSedh2F3F6dDFUliX5VGIu69SqP6YtNWe RP472fQ0GAM= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB666ABE88; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:50:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3C47FABE84; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:50:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Jeff King Cc: Ian Campbell , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] filter-branch: Handle rewritting (very) old style tags which lack tagger References: <1502179560.2735.22.camel@hellion.org.uk> <20170808080620.9536-2-ijc@hellion.org.uk> <20170809102040.l5sb6ukqh2225zqm@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 08:50:06 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20170809102040.l5sb6ukqh2225zqm@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 9 Aug 2017 06:20:41 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6B667BBE-7D1A-11E7-9E29-9D2B0D78B957-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Jeff King writes: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 09:06:20AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > >> Such as v2.6.12-rc2..v2.6.13-rc3 in the Linux kernel source tree. >> >> Insert a fake tag header, since newer `git mktag` wont accept the input >> otherwise: > > Hmm. Now your resulting tag will have this crufty "unknown@example.com" > header baked into it, won't it? > > Should we instead make git-mktag more lenient (possibly with a > command-line option to reduce accidental omissions)? That sounds sensible. Thanks for injecting a dose of sanity.