From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BBC1F4B4 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 23:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243863AbhDLXTq (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:19:46 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:64531 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243377AbhDLXTo (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:19:44 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48ABCAD4C3; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:19:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=L1x8G6NF4V1gcHxsb5Q1bOxRUy4=; b=mJMvGA mHKDDeQckpsmfum/cfKe47/mSSWOuvjse24hJw86LDYQnrjIwifAy8MY/u28Z+6h 0XvASr8hncEfX14E2XWjIOXW6esbH8BMVUfgeBfZRtnifUJ+TFhESdhveHfypdUX hAKwF5TVfyBLOoBMgmfnJUD+UARc9aydDAmmk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Lx0F3Xa9nUnE/cVDZ3flfHbyiSwkgkio YSa2w3TTKw9Dd/8zUetVQCyWkOTb29cRLqgdp08cPPS8ls30vwzlroepibS1PaEW fgKcCDNBJgkw+zNy99qRuArc9WBasuJGPOSVe0ougrhSoc6s+1/TSG3F5PGdZ++l S/KhtF8TxQs= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF96AD4C2; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:19:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD562AD4C1; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 19:19:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "brian m. carlson" , "Randall S. Becker" Cc: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Bagas Sanjaya , Jeff King , Git Users Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] C99: harder dependency on variadic macros References: <67645f4b-b320-3ed6-bf5d-552bae0c2688@gmail.com> <87r1jfeku8.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 16:19:24 -0700 In-Reply-To: (brian m. carlson's message of "Mon, 12 Apr 2021 22:57:40 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8511C85A-9BE5-11EB-89F0-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "brian m. carlson" writes: > If this works on Windows, it will also work on Unix, because POSIX has > required C99 support since the 2001 revision, and __VA_ARGS__ is C99. > Unix systems are not the thing preventing us from enabling C99 support > (or any subset of it) in any meaningful sense. Yeah, among the list (semi-)regulars, the only ones that may likely to be broken is the NonStop folks. Hopefully they are aware of this discussion? https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqeeffe669.fsf@gitster.g/