Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] strvec: use size_t to store nr and alloc

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> I'm a little "meh" on some of these, for a few reasons:
>
>  - anything calling into setup_revisions() eventually is just kicking
>    the can anyway. And these are generally not buggy in the first place,
>    since they're bounded argv creations.
>
>  - passing a strvec instead of the broken-down pair is a less flexible
>    interface. It's one thing if the callee benefits from seeing the
>    strvec (say, because they may push more items onto it). But I think
>    with strbufs, we have a general guideline that if a function _can_
>    take the bare pointer, then it should. (Sorry, I don't have a
>    succinct reference to CodingGuidelines or anything like that; I feel
>    like this is wisdom we came up with on the list in the early days of
>    strbufs).
>
>  - if we are going to pass a strvec, it should almost certainly be
>    const, to make it clear how we intend to use it.

All true.

> These cases are largely stupid things that real people would never come
> across. The real goal is making sure we don't get hit with a memory
> safety bug (under-allocation, converting a big size_t to a negative int,
> etc).

Yes.  

Ævar, I do not mean any disrespect to you, but I have to say that
topics like this one are starting to wear my concentration and
patience down really thin and making me really slow down.

Perhaps I am biased by not yet having seen what you eventually want
to build on top, and because of that I do not understood why and how
these "clean ups" are so valuable to have right now (as opposed to
just letting the sleeping dog lie), which you would of course have a
much better chance to know than I do.

But with that "bias", many of the recent patches from you look more
like pointless churn, mixed with fixes to theoretical problems, than
clean-ups with real benefits.

What makes it worse is that there are occasional real gems among
these "meh" patches, which means I have to read all of them anyway
to sift wheat from chaff X-<.