From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABCE1F506 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 22:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="tjetob7/"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232553AbiIWW5K (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:57:10 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42364 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231981AbiIWW5I (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:57:08 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (pb-smtp20.pobox.com [173.228.157.52]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71D7A147680 for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 15:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE5051B9B00; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:57:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=U+HAVP5un+bZ0ib8Bt+LAYUjTksC8vr5LYy7nx tErR0=; b=tjetob7/dHtEadwjjYj3Y+89owcQx1kofQSwDkocGu1b6uCaA6+3HK 8ii1R7bGqTu5F9n5oTSRyaPB4v4U4ByOG5Mv7fCT03wYFhgBErO47iBCpPSunASk H2IRl2jUi1Upo2g7+Y7odvWHtt56yOCYxgjNTZhKFshOQSlTSN1uQ= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5ED91B9AFF; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:57:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.83.5.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E8EF1B9AFB; Fri, 23 Sep 2022 18:57:00 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Calvin Wan Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, emilyshaffer@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] submodule: parallelize status References: <20220922232947.631309-1-calvinwan@google.com> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 15:56:59 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20220922232947.631309-1-calvinwan@google.com> (Calvin Wan's message of "Thu, 22 Sep 2022 23:29:43 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 08598042-3B93-11ED-83A0-C2DA088D43B2-77302942!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Calvin Wan writes: > Future work: The reason why status is much slower on a cold cache vs > warm cache is mainly due to refreshing the index. It is worth > investigating whether this is entirely necessary. I suspect that the CI breakage https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/3115673002/jobs/5052804463 is due to this topic. In "SANTIZE=leak GIT_TEST_PASSING_SANITIZE_LEAK=true make test" run locally, I see t7507 failing quite badly.