From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D756E1F698 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2023 04:07:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=aBUkVWw4; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229636AbjAAEHH (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Dec 2022 23:07:07 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43660 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229775AbjAAEHE (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Dec 2022 23:07:04 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x631.google.com (mail-pl1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::631]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1235160F1 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2022 20:07:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x631.google.com with SMTP id 17so26062502pll.0 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2022 20:07:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=RQc+dRWyL8ktAF61WKJ/hf9uGBnWtRX/n2x36vZMtR4=; b=aBUkVWw4fRDRvrwHmH+XOjEcxC1/ZIsA5yLr6K2/fJ2ymqYoYYkqGqxvGlrj+kQ5DC a1DZd1yYITFjcrkPqfmsLVPGTmMzrF08jnTVAvzMz6W4vs9fGuWJtwlnCO54iwT8aysR DfU+Dfif+fWQaVJI5sq4wj6cOw46yB9CIWY4/lleMx//bRaRWjgoHbmKcm7wBSUwDQQl YLQfVcJPJPx6pmajSzkeV4b7tdTyjJ7mP7G2UM7ih2nEzmsPLZuArzI507WxCB7bMF4a /oaqJll9a0TTGl4T3nYeqBTr48CXOtcuDtl+oml7h9BDfgW6Xmz4Wk1xRsrPhs5T0Mpu eIsg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RQc+dRWyL8ktAF61WKJ/hf9uGBnWtRX/n2x36vZMtR4=; b=ml5MDLYOjs8SfTIRuEt7K9ECizbvGR/ngg2KGgT4LndEmbnbVEtlqp+4BBCkiPq1Oo zWfT5nZfaDEJN3yLrCHl//+X7dDU6d42UzgJ7GN0cP9T69iCznZ3Fnqe43MxmN1yOJk3 l2+Ut3iQH01GUaeMnYbh+Y6Ey14nwjmqu90kVqACbelKSPOgk+DtymtUgqDDraGYeVv9 f3ZL67Qwwnua6UkS5xo8BJWIyVoiHlQ1hOmUb5Rh8XT+958pNzyRKnLB3Ua1h9t4G2Yw NuyQXRPoQjUS75pWgzzAuxX6U+9OZzop5tKT+CW38Lhxo23b8JELgBMOIMbuBueqnNDc AnYw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqyuJnN9URu2gWtaU9OemOJ0vuW5CoK/whcAt1U9JWDm56mS1LW 5MbBjTs6pbxz8/FJXSouC11WIEsKiYJMBA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXu4Sq6UxGnJX5SuEmyZkECpckCl0JJIT2QnBqxt8n0+HYiqNNhfPUXGmJLs18+/iLaLNz14HQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:cf02:b0:191:283d:5afb with SMTP id i2-20020a170902cf0200b00191283d5afbmr39466177plg.50.1672546021423; Sat, 31 Dec 2022 20:07:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (33.5.83.34.bc.googleusercontent.com. [34.83.5.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p15-20020a170902780f00b00189371b5971sm17522245pll.220.2022.12.31.20.07.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 31 Dec 2022 20:07:00 -0800 (PST) Sender: Junio C Hamano From: Junio C Hamano To: Samuel Wales Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: is this data corruption? References: Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2023 13:07:00 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Samuel Wales's message of "Fri, 30 Dec 2022 17:17:51 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Samuel Wales writes: > the problem that seems like data corruption is that a few lines appear > twice as - and once as +. but in the current version of the files, > those lines exist only once. here are the lines. there are 2 - > versions and one + version: > > +***************** REF bigpart is a partition > +biglike and homelike are distracting nonsense i think except > +to describe inferior filesets. anomalous subset of home > +might be called homelike or so. Sorry, but I do not see any "-" versions in the above. Simple and minimum reproduction recipe would be useful for the list to help. https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html Thanks.