From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git grep: search whole tree by default? Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 12:31:14 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87hac7hmrb.fsf@mcs.anl.gov> <87zjpzg592.fsf@mcs.anl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Matthieu Moy , Piotr Krukowiecki , Git Mailing List To: Jed Brown X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 23 21:31:25 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VZ49M-00029G-Cv for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:31:24 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751788Ab3JWTbU (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Oct 2013 15:31:20 -0400 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:50810 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751447Ab3JWTbT (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Oct 2013 15:31:19 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1254D4D82A; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:31:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=olYkxH46In/n5gcG4G0RADkQyYw=; b=eckWXW kfKjX/Fb6An1XiaAvcKdxIk+7kRVozy365LTwJJGPUm9BYBzRQ900bwKcezDgjhd 7tAikn1JujMSrH04GRN8EThh1iVrTSoLHtqlw+gNDZHn3kXkU8RyqW8wZLnvCDTN U2Eh6rW0K+aVsrglU1gDQNakxIrW2moqj9Fmo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=V6si5WoMRjNLUimaXZ74gfzTVKZDCohG 5/lAkln7B/wpTP+TION84nzR+cqlRvv5DKR0Us4QrGiQyLmShW/+CO5LmAyfu/v1 9aB8k6BK6LpckxeZ9PWol9Ppmelo1buGStrC+kwVl9akTIMJCwA2vtl0f7ItpoUy woeo0ZyS2Ho= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB494D828; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:31:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [72.14.226.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1384F4D820; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:31:16 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <87zjpzg592.fsf@mcs.anl.gov> (Jed Brown's message of "Wed, 23 Oct 2013 14:24:25 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B04D520C-3C19-11E3-99D5-8F264F2CC097-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jed Brown writes: > Junio C Hamano writes: > >> Jed Brown writes: >> >>> Junio C Hamano writes: >>>> I suspect that it would be too late for 2.0 we want to do sometime >>>> early next year, though. >>> >>> How would you manage transition from the current behavior? Warning >>> people to explicitly use "." or ":/" during some interim period sounds >>> worse than just switching the default behavior. >> >> "How would I"? >> >> You're asking that question only because you omitted too much from >> the quote ;-) > > I meant that if the proposed migration plan were to be "just change it > and people will learn" (because anything more gradual would actually be > worse for users) then is it really too late for Git-2.0? I do not know it that is even a workable plan, but I need to sleep on it and then hear opinion from others, but in general, if anybody needs to ask if it is too late, then it already is.