From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E89C52018A for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 22:12:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752434AbcF1WMX (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:12:23 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:50203 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752508AbcF1WMW (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:12:22 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9374C27102; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:11:15 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=nA4FBTuVxFKsObB8qHwCmSfe43w=; b=O5hNxY WxXvsG8xhaPKWp0h9CBYt057ISVQvBHkzbBS26D6TAcXP9OWyOtucPzNWaYAqCk7 H39imXP/huzDQT4D+Ap+A/YmjqaeXamvkBqk46/D2asVUSZ2oShdCsanStAiFQJC wIb0We9cfa7eU5juVFeDHUoTDoVcSDr/lx7RI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=EXZFdYQf6toYwi7X/+eyCvM9dd0j53Zj 5b/xi0uQCt3vTmmISvB9VaW+M54wvq+MT/pLMsxjFRU/3490TpvDKVa4M8cUERaw WTq0fjy14qQDkgmF0x976WgLKz/nOCzO4fW1FmwzHLOVufk74QcB8TzrGCH0y67h 3ypzuE3F0z4= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A72927101; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:11:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FAC827100; Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:11:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41j?= Duy Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , sschuberth@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Config conditional include References: <20160626070617.30211-1-pclouds@gmail.com> <20160628172641.26381-1-pclouds@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 15:11:13 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20160628172641.26381-1-pclouds@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?Ik5n?= =?utf-8?B?dXnhu4VuIFRow6FpIE5n4buNYw==?= Duy"'s message of "Tue, 28 Jun 2016 19:26:39 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3AF5569A-3D7D-11E6-AF20-89D312518317-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Honestly, I'd really prefer to see those with topics in 'pu' that has seen reviews but not yet updated to go back to and polish them to help move things forward, with the goal to have them in 'next' sooner so that we can have fixes and features that are sufficiently vetted and tested in the next release, before starting yet another new topic that will be left hanging in 'pu'. In your case, I am talking about nd/icase, nd/fetch-ref-summary, and nd/connect-ssh-command-config topics. Thanks.