From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F6320193 for ; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 18:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934046AbcHDSsU (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2016 14:48:20 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:64488 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934029AbcHDSsS (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Aug 2016 14:48:18 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2D732971; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 14:48:16 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=5QcDHumwijoYUbuXlIkkhrsw8ME=; b=EqeoiJ oXsjcCf9UgqN6uTPDcMY4lujZmNv47i8hjqOFFihLtBwXckUagWN4aDI3gMRaAfh us3viblI8R4Kum+sshG738InaqvP4189EtnMHSxuA0oR03JojRFGXW6hoIHfA0wq TL9PhUkO8dqJvG8QvGWBb4HGPmB3l6GwQs2dU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=QluJmp3g80whBpfme6SaHs3i0SK59xA6 lSHQlKrNTDICGC0afanSSdh1foKPYKoOb6kO9/1b8X5P6svGyYPwR7Du0wA4kBqA Y7Q07zaiMpRnrbSyJI1avhlfqXnw/UvDgYkr/EMrXHT29O0f9qqqnDMisbEsNDXu KSTNlqkgxLU= Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C23AE3296F; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 14:48:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FC7A3296E; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 14:48:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Michael Haggerty Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Beller , Jeff King , Jakub =?utf-8?Q?Nar=C4=99bski?= , Jacob Keller Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] is_blank_line: take a single xrecord_t as argument References: <4a83126ab9e7bff9061204296798bf281242358e.1470259583.git.mhagger@alum.mit.edu> Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2016 11:48:14 -0700 In-Reply-To: <4a83126ab9e7bff9061204296798bf281242358e.1470259583.git.mhagger@alum.mit.edu> (Michael Haggerty's message of "Thu, 4 Aug 2016 00:00:35 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0126A5EA-5A74-11E6-B781-EE617A1B28F4-77302942!pb-smtp2.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Michael Haggerty writes: > There is no reason for it to take an array and index as argument, as it > only accesses a single element of the array. Yup, I think I am partly guilty. The result looks much nicer.