From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7C22095B for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 18:55:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933411AbdCUSzA (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:55:00 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:59824 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932641AbdCUSxs (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:53:48 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918336EFEA; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:48:13 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=ErPQMvgCMTA+ va1heFxXijtj5pA=; b=vAORW7D5ks3QSLaca54f9GaTZ0tC/q6P5bYVdK9OIH/e sKi1u9auOk+Wl9OV0dY14zolPmtRBq11xC2yaoMDtZ3R3K6MXtCSgPGFLnoI5yZr 7eixOwHQi64uyjxEGuJ6vPLGaC58t9CfB+SHR1o7BY7CY803nwbJUecFo6mORtM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=mOIWvx LnmXr+mlLajaHgoxP9mM44CntumNvVbn842UYI+IPkte9I2p8e803DBfZtQxSnL/ fZ9Vs5hOibNlzXPWchjIZJ65hJ+ddWpi3JsTPXenD1ZBE5+jnnaLK5JJBvcJIztN ecU8Y/qDeyMUNHo/Tzi7N1NzO/dNKjz1gnzZc= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893E46EFE9; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:48:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0A7F6EFE8; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 14:48:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Lars Hjemli , Jeff King , Christian Couder , Carlos Rica , Samuel Tardieu , Tom Grennan , Karthik Nayak Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/16] tag: implicitly supply --list given another list-like option References: <20170321125901.10652-1-avarab@gmail.com> <20170321125901.10652-12-avarab@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:48:11 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20170321125901.10652-12-avarab@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsOG?= =?utf-8?B?dmFyIEFybmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:58:56 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Pobox-Relay-ID: EFC1B52C-0E66-11E7-8360-97B1B46B9B0B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: > Spelunking through the history via: > > git log --reverse -p -G'only allowed with' -- '*builtin*tag*c' > > Reveals that there was no good reason for not allowing this in the > first place. The --contains option added in 32c35cfb1e ("git-tag: Add > --contains option", 2009-01-26) made this an error,. All the other s/,././ > subsequent list-like options that were added copied its pattern of > making this usage an error. Good digging, and I do agree that this is a good change. Thanks.