From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04B420286 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 07:02:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751217AbdILHC3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Sep 2017 03:02:29 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:55539 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750987AbdILHC3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Sep 2017 03:02:29 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D6D290ED8; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 03:02:28 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=30ACyxrCPwSTjHsBqtBG3aabGf4=; b=KmVYgP plKaPx4V+EpYCvB1+vS2GtDmfQ2VjXQ4OuTiDSIWXchC425UJ2/mn45JqGbmfVay CzUFkwyqeSulJhBYaIXgZ43/4ksjgtSdX6h3ZuqpPCquFg9tfT2Gn0eiDRA+nnR+ kqL7av2vcA1FmV8NS9MFcomUlBHOQhgafEjB8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=wmGArmybQV6bnkao/RiHxhp0ZjNKqXZk 12tursbvWJoWdM3+Ex7zMal9rPvSRNKzqE7c2d51T0rD9xCYJ9gVlpTzJjPKG5By jJIHVsOMt+3Oyp6LH/SAj5ElYUldWS5h6aG8l3yiGTj2i4LDyUvDU8JEbKHAKtSF EnMawiJ+c5A= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CBF90ED7; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 03:02:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C7ACC90ED5; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 03:02:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Junio C Hamano To: Nicolas Morey-Chaisemartin Cc: Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] imap-send: use curl by default References: <71479602-fabc-1861-124b-90b26b952344@morey-chaisemartin.com> <20170807200126.fnbz57qd44vj43c6@sigill.intra.peff.net> Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:02:26 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Tue, 12 Sep 2017 15:46:20 +0900") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 565C724A-9788-11E7-BFBC-FE4B1A68708C-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano writes: > I was sweeping my mailbox to collect loose ends that haven't been > tied down, and noticed that this topic does not seem to have reached > a conclusion. Do we want to reboot the effort? Or should we just > throw it in the #leftoverbits bin for now? Ahh, I failed to find newer incarnations of this topic (there was v3 that starts at <087f5907-6558-ce32-2f5c-2e418522c030@morey-chaisemartin.com>) when I wrote it. Sorry about pinging a wrong/old article. I just gave a cursory re-read of the review thread over the v3 series; it appears that we were very close to the finishing line already? Or am I yet missing/forgetting some later developments that made this topic obsolete? Thanks.