From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5BA20954 for ; Sun, 26 Nov 2017 03:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752046AbdKZDtL (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Nov 2017 22:49:11 -0500 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:61398 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752028AbdKZDtK (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Nov 2017 22:49:10 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B01E9F755; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 22:49:10 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ClPGMhVEQ2nwvPN7Qux2vynPoiU=; b=Q94kXo BqbJRBjUcx7xPav/n0AnqJH8qSkY2YWXIbK04LPAQAm/3BsJpGmauvGK25+UXqj0 lt3KUK9zbhHTNLdAUulMAIkIv6wVAbxNIDO/ACXIEusQx0PrwwdLsemVSl9zil54 fyWeCtujKhoPCvQHzerpsHXEh8IFU0cK3Wfuo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=lKjSxNzEbR5W1OmmHUp17KgX/5q3+JlP AzhwRh0RvNpBPsSGx3KO538V7qFHq78MnzTH0X+CYbaP/uiJrWDvuTYI2Affkxz5 KFV6xEOWlam257PTOkifcOmCLXRcfeOuoGxed11ZGurQb/c8T14bZeMyndWX7SG5 bBkUqz8hZiU= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F3B9F754; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 22:49:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.132.0.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B86E59F753; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 22:49:09 -0500 (EST) From: Junio C Hamano To: Todd Zullinger Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] RelNotes: minor typo fixes in 2.15.1 draft References: <20171125173345.17488-1-tmz@pobox.com> <20171125180243.GV3693@zaya.teonanacatl.net> Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 12:49:08 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20171125180243.GV3693@zaya.teonanacatl.net> (Todd Zullinger's message of "Sat, 25 Nov 2017 13:02:44 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C25B61E0-D25C-11E7-B0BD-8EF31968708C-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Todd Zullinger writes: > It was mildly surprising that the script didn't warn or complain about > an unknown option. After a quick look, that seems to be due to the > Getopt::Long pass_through option which sends unknown options to > format-patch. Heh, that is another reason why I recommend against letting send-email run format-patch from within (another a lot bigger one is that running them seprately gives you a chance to look and proofread the output from format-patch one more time before actually sending them out, which also allows you to update additional comments after the three-dash lines).