From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: unnecessary merge in the v4l-dvb tree
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:37:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqk1vhsxdh.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwM0vy+pw-Xv=gA19ULMwAXNPhdO3qR5A3hkMrZKJFNSQ@mail.gmail.com> (Linus Torvalds's message of "Mon, 12 Feb 2018 13:15:04 -0800")
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> The problem, of course, is that since git is distributed, git doesn't
> know who is "upstream" and who is "downstream", so there's no
> _technical_ difference between merging a development tree, and a
> development tree doing a back-merge of the upstream tree.
>
> Maybe it was a mistake to make signed tag merges non-fast-forward,
> since they cause these kinds of issues with people who use "pull" to
> update their otherwise unmodified trees.
>
> I can always teach myself to just use --no-ff, since I end up doing
> things like verifying at the signatures anyway.
>
> Junio, comments?
I have a slight suspicion that allowing 'pull' to fast-forward even
when merging a signed tag when it is pulling from a configured
default remote for the branch the user is on, and otherwise keeping
the current behaviour, would make majority of people from both camps
happier, but I also have a strong conviction that it is being too
clever and making it hard to explain to people to do such a dwim
that tries to guess which way is 'upstream'.
Another clue we _might_ be able to take advantage of is that when
upstream maintainers merge a signed tag, we do *not* fetch and store
the tag from downstream contributers in our local repository (it is
likely that we have --no-tags in remote.<name>.tagopt), but when
downstream contributers sync from us with "git pull", they do fetch
and store our tags in their local repository.
So "git pull $somewhere $tag" that defaults to "--ff" when the tag
gets stored somewhere in refs/ (or more explicitly, in refs/tags/)
and defaults to "--no-ff" otherwise (i.e. the tag is fetched only to
be recorded in the resulting merge, without ever stored in any of
our refs), might be a good balance.
And it is easy to explain: "We realize that it was a mistake to
unconditionally default to --no-ff and we are reverting the default
to --ff, but with a twist. When we tell 'pull' to grab a tag, if
we do not store it anywhere in our local ref space, that would mean
the tag is totally lost if the pull fast-forwards. That is why we
still use --no-ff in such a case."
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-12 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20180213080036.3bf3a908@canb.auug.org.au>
2018-02-12 21:15 ` linux-next: unnecessary merge in the v4l-dvb tree Linus Torvalds
2018-02-12 21:36 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-02-12 21:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-12 21:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-02-12 21:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-12 23:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-02-13 0:21 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-02-13 17:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-02-13 17:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-02-14 18:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-02-15 22:45 ` [PATCH] merge: allow fast-forward when merging a tracked tag Junio C Hamano
2018-02-15 23:34 ` Eric Sunshine
2018-02-16 18:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2018-02-16 21:27 ` [PATCH v2] " Junio C Hamano
2018-02-12 21:37 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqk1vhsxdh.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).