From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C471F463 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 17:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2405231AbfITRv2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:51:28 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:54958 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2404985AbfITRv1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:51:27 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C762F3F1; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:51:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=sw9ObVaVsJ4pECILxEYriQn5Vag=; b=SpboE5 N+MV5jSMA6MpIRGhlb1qxSeMNqoQ8ok2fkD/vrwUUkKLJdO+/kDllfzrJJ2887i3 SefVUDIcb1IZxyJwTh/QZQPSDqTPJEwMb0s45vjYvR7xOChH2G7bFfZ9VPNSsMTW 1atgWYmqoMCn9MQ2nJqgbR/TLJ5v9idTeZr5U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=a7TntlgORiP8s1C51oAhCMdS9hFiCoT0 oD4lu/guzWGKpcLpUD3Gkc+KpQ7He9hamN33rK208krpc8qrh31d7bORyiz3FukT UUWNLyOWonSLD2f/bRgaNNFcbQ9uDAk9/XBijWtVJiws0MbicEWIRw/KRFRFqDVs 8TkYz5y0EmE= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0855D2F3F0; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:51:25 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.76.80.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69DCB2F3EE; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:51:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Garima Singh Cc: Denton Liu , Derrick Stolee , "git\@vger.kernel.org" , "peff\@peff.net" , Emily Shaffer , Jonathan Nieder , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Growing the Git community References: <71fba9e7-6314-6ef9-9959-6ae06843d17a@gmail.com> <20190919173423.GA70421@dentonliu-ltm.internal.salesforce.com> <7819b52e-9222-8158-d26d-bf4ab2eec498@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 10:51:23 -0700 In-Reply-To: <7819b52e-9222-8158-d26d-bf4ab2eec498@gmail.com> (Garima Singh's message of "Fri, 20 Sep 2019 11:22:37 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4340DC90-DBCF-11E9-92FE-C28CBED8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Garima Singh writes: >> could get people to tag with [FIRST PATCH] or something when sending in >> their first patch. I personally think that the [FIRST PATCH] thing will add distraction without helping much, so I am mildly negative on that idea. >> If the patch is not desired, then we should explain why it wasn't >> desired instead of just leaving them hanging. I know Junio is too busy >> to say "hey, I'm picking this patch up" to every single patchset, It's not busy-ness but more of forgetfullness, or being human. I'll try harder ;-) >> but if >> a patch is desired, perhaps the rest of us could pick up the slack and >> say, "hey, your patchset was picked up by Junio in his gitster repo on >> this branch". OK.