From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78581F4B4 for ; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 21:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2438614AbgJTVA7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:00:59 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.70]:63365 "EHLO pb-smtp1.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2438555AbgJTVA6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:00:58 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389E386D81; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:00:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=e5hSc9c1BPnhNrROwuyndT2WaO8=; b=QpROJs WLnitGIK3FQtpuBzO5VXYttJLfTHpu4WudNrAazNwVYDEKlmaoazbMXC2SvDAP4T efdtjYXew7/5yJzbAQREkoWac/DzcP4u59/kB9pbMK8o027yFWOprWlcOIdSHHKJ 2Z37ZMWlFlcvOgnUTbxDhrhbhYoswVEXqcJKc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Z6sRc+Ql1CNktl15bVNBtMHC4ZRWw2RR sbKKvu+qM+AcgoGuT494pa3YBpMsSH+An+jmdV2pJYJIGwqDlyqg1C5tRU7n1BjC WSa1L+Vdn7JWAOIW65mcoMFEazjajL9HTbA8gfBvMBwZG8gsDFtFJC0Byr0ZIWWq wdihIDFe1AE= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30AA786D80; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:00:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.74.119.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B40A286D7F; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:00:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: Taylor Blau Cc: Charvi Mendiratta , git@vger.kernel.org, christian.couder@gmail.com, phillip.wood123@gmail.com, congdanhqx@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] t7201: put each command on a separate line References: <20201017075455.9660-1-charvi077@gmail.com> <20201020121152.21645-1-charvi077@gmail.com> <20201020201535.GB75186@nand.local> <20201020203024.GC75186@nand.local> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 14:00:56 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20201020203024.GC75186@nand.local> (Taylor Blau's message of "Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:30:24 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 59414DCE-1317-11EB-84F4-D152C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Taylor Blau writes: >> As [v4] single patch won't apply standalone, we cannot quite declare >> the victory yet. Are [v3 1-5/5] (or [v3 1-4/5] + [v4]) good to the >> reviewers of the past rounds? > > For what it's worth, I'm happy with [v3 1-4/5] + [v4]. Yeah, I'm happy with them, but this is an impression only from a quick skimming---I guess I'd just trust you and won't go back to the patches with fine toothed comb myself ;-). Thanks, all.