From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
"Christian Couder" <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
"Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Christian Couder" <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>,
"Taylor Blau" <me@ttaylorr.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] Introduce new merge-tree-ort command
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 22:08:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xmqqk0f4jhh8.fsf@gitster.g> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CABPp-BHQdkhAEmTrtc+XMgj5A5ASBVRw0_bXH10NSrMsyRK+oA@mail.gmail.com
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes:
>> so it may be quite simple to deprecate "merge -s recursive".
>
> Yes...but why deprecate? I thought the plan was to (eventually) make
> requests for either `recursive` or `ort` be handled by running the
> `ort` backend. Making that kind of switch is much smaller than the
> one we already made to switch the default backend from `recursive` to
> `ort`, so I'm not sure I see what we gain by doing such a switch in
> stages. Maybe I'm missing something?
Didn't we "deprecate" but still indefinitely support "annotate"? I
have been assuming that recursive will be in that category after ort
establishes itself.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-13 6:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-05 16:33 [RFC PATCH 0/2] Introduce new merge-tree-ort command Christian Couder
2022-01-05 16:33 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] merge-ort: add " Christian Couder
2022-01-05 17:08 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-05 16:33 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] merge-ort: add t/t4310-merge-tree-ort.sh Christian Couder
2022-01-05 17:29 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-05 16:53 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] Introduce new merge-tree-ort command Elijah Newren
2022-01-05 17:32 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-07 17:58 ` Christian Couder
2022-01-07 19:06 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-10 13:49 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-10 17:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-11 13:47 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-11 17:00 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-11 22:25 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-12 18:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-12 20:06 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-13 6:08 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2022-01-13 8:01 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-13 9:26 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-12 17:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-01-13 9:22 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-10 17:59 ` Elijah Newren
2022-01-11 21:15 ` Elijah Newren
2022-02-22 13:08 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-11 22:30 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-12 0:41 ` Elijah Newren
2022-02-22 12:44 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-01-07 19:54 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xmqqk0f4jhh8.fsf@gitster.g \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).