From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
	shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35FD51F852
	for <e@yhbt.net>; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 21:53:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S229957AbiANVxr (ORCPT <rfc822;e@yhbt.net>);
        Fri, 14 Jan 2022 16:53:47 -0500
Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com ([173.228.157.53]:63836 "EHLO
        pb-smtp21.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S229498AbiANVxr (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 14 Jan 2022 16:53:47 -0500
Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
        by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0171169BCC;
        Fri, 14 Jan 2022 16:53:46 -0500 (EST)
        (envelope-from junio@pobox.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc
        :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version
        :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=QE9CVLWUPlbX
        ZiL1dSaaKhuEmi916fOAvBQ951uC2yE=; b=cN8/a1Q8/txP9XKxiUtFC6GjETDd
        sHncerUue8U/4PscXUE+iYeCq7tslK7yW0s1UVT1UdVZ0qqB/7VyMj10mE5yw1Z4
        GDAn7LFaEuL6Jaj24xRVkB+fFYjg6S2CBDjrLdtN9TJ4eKsCViexn6B99leUiJ7o
        t8Lks0nPUEFdWDo=
Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1])
        by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82E6169BCB;
        Fri, 14 Jan 2022 16:53:46 -0500 (EST)
        (envelope-from junio@pobox.com)
Received: from pobox.com (unknown [104.133.2.91])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 51B38169BC9;
        Fri, 14 Jan 2022 16:53:44 -0500 (EST)
        (envelope-from junio@pobox.com)
From:   Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To:     =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com>
Cc:     "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>,
        Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
        Han-Wen Nienhuys via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
        git@vger.kernel.org, Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwenn@gmail.com>,
        Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@google.com>,
        Carlo Marcelo Arenas =?utf-8?Q?Bel=C3=B3n?= 
        <carenas@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: v2.35.0 DEVELOPER=1 regression
References: <pull.1152.git.git.1638899124.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
        <8deccc3a1dff7e4f7d613fa63d2781fd1f11f841.1638899124.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
        <xmqqlf0w5bbc.fsf@gitster.g>
        <YbAVOtYXA1Hf9EtJ@coredump.intra.peff.net>
        <xmqq4k7j68eg.fsf@gitster.g>
        <YbEMnksMEuAz3Nt0@coredump.intra.peff.net>
        <211209.867dcekm9h.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>
        <YbMWNZCpy578Qu+l@coredump.intra.peff.net>
        <220113.86tue7vr6d.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>
        <YeDUA6NhHuCUkqXf@camp.crustytoothpaste.net>
        <xmqqilumayfh.fsf@gitster.g>
        <220114.8635lqrqci.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Jan 2022 13:53:43 -0800
In-Reply-To: <220114.8635lqrqci.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsOG?=
 =?utf-8?B?dmFyIEFybmZqw7Zyw7A=?=
        Bjarmason"'s message of "Fri, 14 Jan 2022 21:41:07 +0100")
Message-ID: <xmqqk0f29e6w.fsf@gitster.g>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 719711A8-7584-11EC-9F35-CBA7845BAAA9-77302942!pb-smtp21.pobox.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <git.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org

=C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> writes:

>> Wow, that sounds horribly broken.
>
> Yes, but it's also working as designed :) We're erroring because the C
> library headers on the OS aren't C99-compliant. That it would apply to
> only git.git's sources was only ever wishful thinking.

No, C library supporting only C11 is perfectly fine.  On such a
system, the compiler shouldn't even support -std=3Dgnu99.  That is
what I consider broken.