From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089B71F4D7 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 18:50:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1380011AbiD2Sxb (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:53:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56284 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1357909AbiD2Sxa (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:53:30 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (pb-smtp1.pobox.com [64.147.108.70]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59C293B2 for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:50:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pb-smtp1.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A23711B553; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:50:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=7PvzrqIoHBuOF4XAJZ3ENXvKyo21nmXMQDD31Y WeClI=; b=lk92cc6Fn3w4A7PPTKN58MXrI2IV4fIQNV503pdZKL394OVdSOaOoe MAl8tX4E1pmmV+4UeuNhwGQkkFFXW0PzjeOMl3JigZt4yflTcffv18oY3mg7O50r tp57Me4tqNAPDHx4FDuGDgw41BeR4ZjI/8LmvtUsh3y4ZfLcekcoE= Received: from pb-smtp1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F5A11B550; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:50:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [34.83.65.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 204DB11B54F; Fri, 29 Apr 2022 14:50:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from junio@pobox.com) From: Junio C Hamano To: "Tao Klerks via GitGitGadget" Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Tao Klerks , =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIg?= =?utf-8?B?QXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason , Eric Sunshine , Josh Steadmon Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] New options to support "simple" centralized workflow References: Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 11:50:04 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Tao Klerks via GitGitGadget's message of "Fri, 29 Apr 2022 09:56:43 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 2F9B5F8C-C7ED-11EC-9485-5E84C8D8090B-77302942!pb-smtp1.pobox.com Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org "Tao Klerks via GitGitGadget" writes: > This patchset introduces two new configuration options, intended to be > consistent with and complementary to the push.default "simple" option. It > also improves remote-defaulting in "default push" scenarios. Thanks. I still do not know offhand if the 'simple' thing makes sense without thinking it through, but I think that the 'missing origin is fine and we can use the unique remote if exists' is a really good idea, especially if some push strategies already do so and some don't, which seems to be the case. Will queue.